Laserfiche WebLink
Comprehensive Plan Amendment — CARDINAL VIEW <br />City of Lake Elmo <br />Washington County, Minnesota <br />Resolution Noe 2005-005 <br />A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT <br />GUIDING LAND USE FROM RAD TO RED <br />TO D & T DEVELOPMENT <br />WHEREAS, D & T Development has made application to the City of Lake Elmo <br />for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, amending the land use guiding from RAD to <br />RED for the following parcel of land; to wit: <br />Combined Parcel Legal Description <br />That part of Government Lot 2 and that part of the SW '/4 of the NW 1/4, Section <br />27, Township 29, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota, which part lies <br />south and west of the following described line: Commencing at the East Quarter <br />corner of said Section 27; thence on a grid bearing of South 00 degrees 4' <br />04 seconds East, along the east line of said Section 27 a distance of <br />657.18 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 89 <br />degrees 11 minutes 51 seconds West 2125.75 feet; thence South 00 degrees 42 <br />minutes 41 seconds East 153.25 feet; thence South 89 degrees 1.1 minutes 51 <br />seconds West 1113.73 .feet; thence North 34 degrees 41 minutes 56 seconds <br />West, 695.58 feet; thence North 00 degrees 42 minutes 41 seconds West, 466 <br />feet; thence North 67 degrees 22 minutes 53 seconds West 1.450.82 feet; thence <br />North 00 degrees 33 minutes 40 seconds West 219.31 feet; thence South 89 <br />degrees 11 minutes 48 seconds West 317.27 feet more or less to a point on. the <br />west line of said Section 27 distant 1029.01 feet north of the West Quarter corner <br />of said Section and there ending. <br />WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission considered this <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment request at its December 13, 2004 meeting, and <br />recommended that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment be granted. <br />WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment request was presented to the <br />City Council at its January 4, 2005 City Council Meeting where the following Finding <br />was made: <br />