My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/06/2001 EDAC Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Economic Development Advisory Committee
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
09/06/2001 EDAC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2022 3:36:33 PM
Creation date
7/12/2017 10:28:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EDAC
EDAC Document Type
EDAC Minutes
Meeting Date
09/06/2001
EDAC Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />APPROVED <br /> <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT <br />ADVISORY COMMITTEE <br />MINUTES <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />DATE: Thursday, September 6, 2001 <br />MEMBERS <br />PRESENT: H. Juni, F. Chase, K. Hansmann, D. Gorowsky, B. Hicks, T. Vacha <br />MEMBERS <br />ABSENT: R. Jensen, J. Milbauer, J. Schwartz <br />OTHERS <br />PRESENT: D. Carlson, C. Dahl, M. Divine, B. Wessel, R. Rafferty , A. Rolek <br /> <br /> <br />GENERAL/MINUTES <br /> <br />Mr. Chase noted that this is Mr. Wessel’s last EDAC meeting and thanked him for his <br />years of leadership. <br /> <br />The August 2, 2001 minutes were approved with one typographical correction. <br /> <br />MARKETPLACE DEVELOPMENT <br />Mr. Wessel stated that Councilmembers Dahl and Carlson abstained on the final PDO <br />vote, which meant the project was not approved. At that time it was assumed that, as in <br />the past, a super majority vote (4/5) vote was needed. After investigation by the city <br />attorney, it was concluded that recent legislation mandated that cities use a 3/5 vote for <br />this type of rezone, therefore the project was actually approved. The subsidy vote is at the <br />next council meeting. The opening date for Target will likely slide to October 2002, due <br />to the delays. <br /> <br />Ms. Carlson stated that she and Ms. Dahl met with Mike Grochala and Linda Waite <br />Smith and said they would reconsider their vote. She abstained because she had concerns <br />she wanted worked on before it went to a vote. Her concerns included completion of Rice <br />Creek Watershed review, and there is no contract with JADT, no development agreement, <br />and outstanding road issues. Mr. Wessel stated all those issues were conceptually agreed <br />to and will be implemented as part of the development process. <br /> <br />Ms. Carlson read one paragraph from a resignation letter from the Environmental Board <br />chairman that stated that economic development issues should not take precedence over <br />environmental concerns. Mr. Chase said plans can be approved conditioned upon <br />approval of other entities. In order to construction to begin, all the outstanding issues
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.