My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/06/2001 EDAC Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Economic Development Advisory Committee
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
12/06/2001 EDAC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2022 3:36:33 PM
Creation date
7/12/2017 10:29:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EDAC
EDAC Document Type
EDAC Minutes
Meeting Date
12/06/2001
EDAC Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />APPROVED <br /> <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT <br />ADVISORY COMMITTEE <br />MINUTES <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />DATE: Thursday, December 6, 2001 <br />MEMBERS <br />PRESENT: H. Juni, R. Jensen, T. Vacha, J. Schwartz, F. Chase, B. Hicks, <br />MEMBERS <br />ABSENT: D. Gorowsky, J. Milbauer, K. Hansmann <br />OTHERS <br />PRESENT: D. Carlson, M. Divine, M. Grochala <br /> <br /> <br />GENERAL/MINUTES <br /> <br />Minutes of October 4, 2001 were approved. <br /> <br />APPOINTMENTS <br /> <br />Ms. Divine notified the committee that three members, Mr. Juni, Mr. Gorowsky and Mr. <br />Chase were up for reappointment. All three had reapplied. One other resident had made <br />application. Ms. Carlson informed the committee that the Council may be interviewing <br />all candidates, not just the new applicants, and they were hoping to make the <br />appointments by the end of the year. <br /> <br />VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />Ms. Divine stated the city did not receive a Livable Communities grant this year. She <br />stated that staff had had some preliminary discussions with a developer also interested in <br />the Village development. <br /> <br />MORATORIUM ON HOUSING <br /> <br />Mr. Grochala notified the board that staff was recommending a 12-month moratorium on <br />housing to allow time to revise the city’s subdivision and zoning ordinances to implement <br />the Comprehensive Plan. This would include growth management requirements that lay <br />out the phasing plans for new housing subdivisions to implement the 147 homes per year <br />goal. Without a moratorium new development applications would keep coming. Without <br />the new ordinances, developers are caught in a grey area, where the city is talking about <br />new ordinances while the existing ones are still in place. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.