Laserfiche WebLink
Aug. 21, 1974 <br />The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board was called <br />to order at 8:10 P.M. on August 21, 1974 by Chairman Karth. Members pre- <br />sent; Kelling, Shearen, Lombardi, L'Ailler, Hill. Mr. Nadeau will be late. <br />Mr. Marier was also present. <br />Mr. Kelling moved to approve the minutes of the July 17, 1974 meeting as <br />written. Seconded by Mr. Shearen. Motion carried. <br />Mr. Prokop presented the Board with a revised petition concerning the <br />improvemeet of 'Lakeview' Avenue in the Otter Lake Hills plat. This <br />petition requests the City to improve the street and that the abutting pro- <br />perties be assessed. <br />Mr. Karth said at the present time the City is not in a financial position <br />to issue bonds to cover this improvement. <br />Mr. Prokop asked if bonding wasn't the normal way of handling this with the <br />assessments against the property owners and was told, Yes. He then asked if <br />there was some way this could be placed on a priority list so that when bond- <br />ing was feasible, this could be handled in the normal sequence. <br />Mr. Marier said the main needs of the City at the present time is sewers and <br />here you would have to take into consideration the needs of many against the <br />needs of three persons. <br />Mr. Prokop understood this and agreed. He asked if it was possible to get <br />a favorable recommendation from this Board, pending favorable bonding <br />capabalities. <br />Mr. Karth felt this could be delayed an indefinite period and oould possibly <br />put a burden on a future Board. He suggested that the property owners install <br />this street themselves as suggested by the Attorney. The cost would be <br />much less. <br />Mr. Junkis questioned the legality of installing a street abutting property <br />that is not owned by the persons installing the street. <br />Mr. Kelling felt this was something that would have to be discussed with the <br />Council and the Attorney. He felt that the Council would not turn down a <br />reasonable plan to improve a street. West St. should be widened by 30' and <br />also brought up to City standards. <br />Mr. Junkis asked, if this street is put in by private parties, then it must <br />be turned over to the City before the City will assume maintanence? He was <br />told, Yes. If it is not turned over to the City, can the property owners <br />use the street? Yes, it can be used, but no building permits will be issued. <br />Mr. Prokop said that his property does not reach to an existing street, can <br />he go in front of another property owners' land with the proposed street <br />improvements? <br />