Laserfiche WebLink
I There is a closed meeting in the City Administrator's office immediately <br />after this meeting to discuss litagation. <br />August 13, 1981 <br />There was some discussion on the mail boxes along Birch Street for this <br />development. Mrs. Elsenpeter noted that this problem is already in the <br />process of being taken care of. <br />Mr. Jaworski moved to adjourn. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Aye. 10:35 P.M. <br />These minutes were considered and approved at a regular meeing held on <br />August 24, 1981. <br />Edna L. Sarner,'Clerk- Treasurer, <br />August 24, 1981 <br />The regular meeting of the Lino Lakes City Council was called to order at <br />7:30 P.M., August 24, 1981 by Mayor Gourley. Council members present; <br />Elsenpeter, Jaworski. Absent; Kulaszewicz, McLean. Mr. Locher, Mr. Meister, <br />and Mr. Schumacher were also present. <br />On considering the minutes of the May 27, 1981 and July 15, 1981 Public • <br />Hearings meetings, it was noted there are several ommissions. Mr. Jaworski <br />moved to table consideration until the next meeting. Seconded by Mrs. <br />Elsenpeter. Motion carried unanimously. <br />IIConsideration of the August 13, 1981 mimutes was on the agenda next. Mr. <br />Al Ross interrupted to ask if the original plan for sewers had been aborted <br />and Mayor Gourley said the action taken was approval only a shorter version. <br />Mr. Ross said that is not what he asked - he is asking if the main original <br />project was aborted? His concern was that the $600.00 area wide assessment <br />is still on there - Mayor Gourley said that particular assessment was <br />eliminated. Mr. Ross - is there anything in the minutes anyplace that they <br />can see that the project was aborted. Mayor Gourley said the Council did <br />not take any action to abort the project - the action taken was to approve <br />a shorter project. Mr. Ross asked Mr. Locher, isn't it correct that the <br />Council should abort the first project before they go into a second one? <br />if not, there are a lot of things hanging fire - we as citizens got a right <br />to know and I'd like an answer on that. <br />Mr. Locher said the the action was to put in part of the system and not <br />all and in doing so, automatically rejects the rest of it. Mr. Ross said <br />he understood what he was saying but he would feel a lot more comfortable <br />if it would say it in the minutes - we don't know if that is automatic or <br />not. And sure would make us feel a lot better if it was on a motion in <br />the minutes and I don't see whats wrong with that - it only takes one <br />minute to do it. <br />Mr. Locher said this is inherent in the motion but it's up to the Council <br />if they wish, but there are only three members present this evening. <br />IMr. Ross siad he would have no problem if it was laid over until the next <br />meeting. <br />Mayor Gourley suggested that Mr. Ross bring his question back to the Sept. <br />14, 1981 meeting. Mr. Ross thought he would be out of town and asked <br />that the records show this. <br />