My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/10/2012 EDAC Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Economic Development Advisory Committee
>
Minutes
>
2012
>
05/10/2012 EDAC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2022 3:55:29 PM
Creation date
5/20/2015 3:28:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EDAC
EDAC Document Type
EDAC Minutes
Meeting Date
05/10/2012
EDAC Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />APPROVED <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT <br />ADVISORY COMMITTEE <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />DATE: May 10, 2012 <br />MEMBERS <br />PRESENT: L. Salzman, J. Stranik, J. Schwartz, M. Kassner, B. Combs <br />MEMBERS <br />ABSENT: L. Thor, D. Johnson, L. Masonik, C. Wagner <br /> <br />OTHERS PRESENT: M. Divine, M. Grochala (part) <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />The minutes of February 16, 2012 were approved with correction to Page 2. April 16, 2012 were <br />approved. <br /> <br />REVIEW OF MEETING WITH ANOKA COUNTY <br />Ms. Divine reviewed the results of staff meeting with Anoka County regarding the tax forfeited <br />parcels in the Legacy development. The county has now set a value for pay 2013 and has <br />determined it will not put them up for public auction at this time because it is unlikely to get <br />sold. If the city finds a developer, the city can ask the county to hold a parcel from public sale, <br />and can purchase the property as fair market value. <br /> <br />There has been an ongoing guesswork with attempting to attract new development because staff <br />could not tell a developer what a parcel will cost. If a developer must pay for property and <br />assessments, it was unlikely to be financially viable to develop at this point. Staff learned that if <br />there are assessments pending on a property, the county will return what it got for the land to the <br />city, minus what the county spent administering tax forfeited lands for that particular year. Based <br />on past averages, the city must assume that it will not receive the first $100,000 of the land price <br />back for assessment. Ms. Schwartz said there is a risk to a developer not knowing if the $100,000 <br />was coming off his assessments. Likewise, first floor commercial with housing above will no <br />longer sell. Staff agrees and has begun discussion with P&Z regarding the need to change that. It <br />is more likely if apartments/density is developed, commercial will follow. Ms. Schwartz said it’s <br />on average $110,000 to build a unit, and apartment 10,500 units are planned in the next year. Mr. <br />Grochala said the city will look at writing down assessments based on what else a new <br />development brings in, including building permits, property taxes, utility connections, etc. <br /> <br />The next step is to have Springsted, the city’s financial consultants, complete an analysis that <br />identifies the city’s options, looks at the cost of doing nothing versus offering discounted <br />assessments or other financial incentives to get development moving. Ms. Schwartz said the <br />large scale projects are getting built, largely financed by the insurance companies. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.