Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br />9~~2 ~ y~ <br />~5 <br />CLEVELAND AVENUE FEASIBILITY REPORT <br />Maurer briefly commented on items in his letter dated September <br />5, 1990 relating to the final draft of the Cleveland Avenue <br />feasibility report. Dan Soler of Ramey County Public Works <br />reviewed the project which originally provided for a 52 foot <br />wide street with four traffic lanes which would allow no space <br />for a pathway without obtaining additional right-of-way from <br />the University of Minnesota. He explained that the Minnesota <br />Department of Transportation anticipates amending their design <br />standards which would allow decreasing the width of the street, <br />and the County's proposal for Cleveland Ave. has been amended <br />to provide for construction of a 48 foot roadway with two traffic <br />lanes and a center turn lane. This would allow space for a <br />pathway on the east side of Cleveland without obtaining additional <br />right-of-way and would address the City of Roseville's objection <br />to a four lane roadway. The amended plan would increase the <br />cost to Falcon Heights due to the fact that the County funding <br />policy provides for payment of 100 of travel lanes but only <br />25~ for shoulders. The increased cost to the City for the <br />narrower roadway would be approximately $39,000. Council discussed <br />whether or not it was prudent to construct a pathway at a cost <br />of $39,000, and other possible options. Following the discussion <br />Jacobs moved, seconded by Wallin, that Ramsey County be requested <br />to come back with a design for a 52 foot roadway, striped for <br />two lanes, with a center turn lane which would reduce the City's <br />financial responsibility. Upon a vote being taken the following <br />voted in favor thereof: Jacobs, Gehrz and Wallin, and the <br />following voted against the same: Baldwin and Ciernia. Motion <br />carried. <br />HAP9LINE AVENUE PROJECT TO BE DISCUSSED AT 9/26/90 COUNCIL MEETING <br />Baldwin asked Mr. Soler why Hamline Avenue, which is scheduled <br />for reconstruction in 1991, could not be narrowed to 48 feet <br />if the criteria is being amended. Soler replied that it would <br />require preparing new plans which would be costly and that <br />the County has some time constraints in using their bonding <br />funds. Council requested that the item be placed on the next <br />Council Agenda. <br />DeMARTINO LIABILITY CLAIM TO BE SUBMITTED TO CITY'S INSURANCE <br />CARRIER <br />Baldwin explained that Marvin DeMartino, 1345 W. California, <br />has submitted a claim to the City for repair of the sewer line <br />at his residence. Mr. DeMartino was of the opinion that the <br />City should pay for the repair as the break was in the area <br />where the cast iron pipe from the house connected to the clay <br />pipe installed by the City in 1958. He also felt it was damaged <br />by heavy equipment at the time Hamline Avenue was reconstructed <br />