Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />JANUARY 23, 1991 <br />PAGE 3 <br />she felt it would not be prudent to continue with street <br />improvements at this time. She also commented on the fact that <br />she had had no requests from residents that the streets need to <br />be done, but only from those who felt it was unnecessary. <br />Baldwin stressed the effect on the City's ability to bond if <br />street repair is postponed and many streets need construction at <br />the same time, and the fact that it may be the last time MSA <br />funds will be available to help defray costs. Ciernia felt it <br />would be an advantage to obtain bids at this time in order to <br />have a true cost of the project. Wallin then moved adoption of <br />Resolution R-91-5. Upon a vote being taken the following voted <br />in favor thereof: Baldwin, Ciernia, Jacobs and Wallin, and the <br />following voted against the same: Gehrz. Motion carried. <br />RESOLUTION R-91-5 <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND <br />ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS (1991 STREET IMPROVEMENTS) <br />CITY TO REQUEST SPEED STUDY ON LARPENTEUR AVENUE, FULHAM TO <br />CLEVELAND <br />Wiessner explained that in a letter dated December 21, 1990 (a <br />copy of which is on file in the City Office), Ramsey County has <br />responded to the City's questions regarding speed on Larpenteur <br />Avenue from Cleveland to Fulham. The concern regarding speed <br />was originally brought to the City by Thor Kommedahl, a <br />concerned resident at 1666 Coffman. Following a brief <br />discussion, Council agreed to request that the County conduct a <br />speed study on Larpenteur Avenue to determine if the speed limit <br />should be lowered. This decision was based on the fact that the <br />construction of 1666 Coffman has increased pedestrian crossings <br />as well as vehicular traffic accessing the condominiums. <br />RECYCLING CONTRACT DISCUSSION - ITEM DEFERRED TO 2/13/91 MEETING <br />Wiessner presented a tally sheet for three proposals seriously <br />considered by the Solid Waste Commission and explained the <br />complexity of comparing the estimated costs. Chenoweth outlined <br />the evaulation method followed by the Commission and the <br />rationale behind their recommendation that the contract be <br />awarded to Knutson Services, Inc. <br />Tom Glander, President of SuperCycle, the City's present <br />recycling firm stressed their quality service the past few <br />years, extra services offered, relationship with multi-unit <br />owners/managers, the advantage of having a contracted market for <br />magazines, and requested that Council consider extending the <br />current contract to allow time for negotations. Mr. Glander <br />also indicated that Knutson would be more costly due to <br />increased bin rental fees (30 gallon bins would require an <br />incrased number of bins), the possibility that the City would <br />find it necessary to pay for disposal of magazines and other <br />difficult to market items under the loss sharing provision, and <br />possible liability if automobile batteries are collected. They <br />also felt the "per household" charge proposed by Knutson would <br />