CCMin_84Sep19_Special - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 19, 1984 PAGE 3 Mayor Eggert moved, seconded by Councilmember Ciernia, that the project be i referred to the Planning Commission and Planner John Uban. Motion carried unanimously. Attorney Gasteazoro explained that Bullseye is in need of two conditional uses, BULLSEYE one for warehousing in a B-2 district, and the use of the liquor store during GOLF construction for offices and storage of building materials. Robert Collins, CONDITIONAL representing Bullseye Golf, stated they will not be using the liquor store for USE GRANTED storage of building supplies so that conditional use is not necessary. Follow- WAREHOUSING ing a short discussion, Mayor Eggert moved, seconded by Councilmember Hard, IN B-2 that a conditional use be granted allowing Bullseye to warehouse in an R-2 zone. DISTRICT Motion carried unanimously. Attorney Gasteazoro reviewed with Council the latest draft of the proposed DEVELOPMENT development agreement and addressed the following items: (1) Since Bullseye at AGREEMENT present owes the City approximately $12,000 in consulting costs an additional REVIEWED letter of credit in the amount of $25,000 is necessary. Mr. Collins objected as a letter of credit is costly and a complicated process. (2) Sale of the liquor store, sell the stock to another retailer or a wholesaler, have a sale at the store, advertise fixtures and vacate the store by October l5, 1984 providing the development agreement is signed. Upon the recommendation of the Fiscal Consultant the store will not be signed over to Bullseye until after January 1, 1985 (for benefit of the tax increment), the store will be leased to Bullseye at a rent to be determined by the Clerk Administrator. (3) Prohibition of construction equipment in the residential neighborhood, may use Arona from Larpenteur to Crawford and Crawford from Snelling to • Arona only. (4) Concerns over phase construction, the Attorney assured that Bullseye would be in violation of the development agreement if the project is not completed. The Attorney explained that Bullseye cannot sell withoti~ Council approval. (60 Signage, at present Bullseye sign only, future tenant may desire a sign on other end of building, no billboard advertising atop the building. A discussion ensued regarding the liquor store sale price stipulation in the SALE OF agreement. Councilmembers Ciernia and Baldwin felt that since the City had LIQUOR STORF an offer of $150,000 for the store, it should not be sold to Bullseye for DISCUSSED $137,500. Councilmember Hard reminded Council that included in the $150,000 offer was a stipulation that the City would assure the purchaser of a liquor license for ten years. The liquor store discussion was interrupted-for a scheduled 9:00 P.M, hearing. Mayor Eggert opened the Public Hearing on the 1985 Budget and Revenue Sharing HEARING ON at 9:00 P.M. and presented the Affidavit of Publication. He explained that 1985 BUDGET the Fire Department made a persuasive case for all items in their budget & REVENUE except the aerial truck and recommended that the budget be adopted as proposed. SHARING The use of Revenue Sharing funds was discussed after-which it was decided to use the funds for policing. There being no one in attendance wishing to be heard, Mayor Eggert closed-the hearing at 9:04 P,M. 'Mayor Eggert moved, seconded by Councilmember Hard, that the Revenue Sharing Funds be designated for policing. Motion carried unanimously. Councilmember Baldwin resumed his objections to the sale of the liquor store LIQUOR STOR] at the price of $137,500. Mayor Eggert stated that the price was based on the DISCUSSION two appraisals made on the store. RESUMED