|
~i~vlL.%
<br />~?'%TA=, lTli 1. viiiVl,T..J~::TI~G,~''U~:~.IC ;:~Ti~iG
<br />'_~ra:iL 3
<br />s. -Z.~r nom. i;r - 1 c ~ }u~~< ~~, >_~. - ,_.
<br />a a v, rY rd?~„'ted theJ" ti:7_'1 Sl~n the '' ~_
<br />~.,'^~JO~Z ~':tv ~' ca..:.Uc.i vE.. o aill,i ~ht;JT v .~ . _ con uraCi v
<br />n ;
<br />?'12'~'v"_dlX'1~, th ~?r.,nU~ v J .. ~ re_~c)?l..v ..i ~.tA. 1'h E nnr ,, ~ J asCi be~^ning ras no ~
<br />e , ~r-~ ~ -, + h; 'dq~;wrters but that =~v i s t?~e intar~ti on
<br />CJE r: Cv.'. t.._t Vf'.G v7 i:. a,rp ~~~'<:. mot,. ~~.
<br />~7_pported lc~u~'y. They a~ e , r trc- proc_ ,~u cf ~ , "'r' ~ t; t~- archi trots fcr
<br />t,1? f~:~'._11t~ ~?}''?<':nS7.Cn atlu UE,i_uinL `arid ^C~ndlrir, 1 ,i1 bE _.."_C~`«dt;d ~_n tiZe
<br />n? ans. Cour~c3'r.e.rLer~ u6tiGrt aid :.~.e~r~ ~: felt that pond_ng and ber°n~.ng,
<br />U~hou'_~~ become a permariont part o_ the ~_c~nd. Attorn~~~ :Tan de ',north stated
<br />`~i_;~ could ve ...~de a part of tYe b,ailding; *~ ;r::_u process.
<br />~~
<br />T~.E'~iLTT
<br />„~, -~.
<br />P1il~...ti.C1.L
<br />dEGv1yING
<br />~ -~^ ff ? ~~~? ^~~„'~; felt ~' na_ z°a.ntirg of ~`~Y~e rezoni t~ srou' d ber'r,~,N;~
<br />L1an.;;::i...~._7. , ._;.~: 1av.a; , wZdt, b
<br />upon the condition that the bezrring becrr?e t~ pe's'Pa.rent f~.~ture regardless KILGRIFr
<br />cf otiTn.ership o" the prcpert;~. I:ayo-r larkentieri agreed and felt rho matter 1739 TATUT~
<br />shotjld be adGrf;:sed at rho ts;:e of the final approval cf t?^e plans. i•u°.
<br />iilfriff a~,ain stated he felt it should. re a part of the rezoni?~.
<br />ark: Ascerno, ~_~'m Tatar., c.Sl'ed for c~ax°if.ca.tion as to ":hicri tt~o options ,'AFC.,K ASCEEuwO
<br />prc~;~ides fo.~ bhe greatest nex~.:arience cf 'she Y;e:~:s, attach ~_t tc the re- 1871. TAT"iTivl~'
<br />zoning; cr a+., tYie t:t~ e the buiid~_ng per:r.t i :~ ~ ss+.zed. Attcrr~ey Van de Tuorth ATTCRTUY
<br />stated that if it. i s a ecndit~ on of revoniT~;, it ~:ould proti~_de ?~:ore assurance VAT4 LE T~iCRd
<br />~th.at it ~tiTould be perzranent reUardless of ownership of the property .
<br />.iayor tiearkertien felt that trying to approve bexr:in~ a_t this r~e~nt ~~oP:.ld
<br />be impossible since there are no drawings and that it should be a part
<br />of ~~e final d::s~.gr_. Attorney va.n de Ncrth stated that since bes,P~..rPg
<br />means ~~:~. f reren t thitz€ s to d::~ff Brent individuals, ~:,.o indicate appre~Tal
<br />conditi aped upon ex~m.s might nia?~e rcre probler:s than making it a condition
<br />of the bu.iiding pexsr,-i_~t and site p~!_an approval.
<br />Mayer idar~:entien closed the Public Hearin; rat 8:17 P. IiE.Yi~IidG
<br />CLVSED
<br />After centirnaed aiscuss-_on, I%aycr MrarTcerktier~ r.:oved, seconded by Councilmember
<br />Eggert, that ~eso~.ution 83-'._~' be appro<°ed :a_th the stipulation that p~.acement
<br />of a be~~a L-e inc?_tzc'ed }.n the site plan requiring approval by the Ceunci.l
<br />,~~nd City Engineer. Motion carried urai~ircusl;~-.
<br />RESCLtJTICN 83-10 RESOLiJTICT~
<br />83 ~o
<br />A Ii.r~SOLIITICTrT AF?ROVING THE -cr:'LOT~lIT1G OF CERTAIN
<br />PKOPERTY IN TIC CITY CF' FALCON 3EIGH'i'~ ItE~L~LST
<br />~.~ IiE~~'LETT PACC;i'LU C0ItP0ItATIOTI
<br />1ARVIN FLOLIi
<br />T;ayor ~~:'arkentien presented a request from Marvin r'lodir., owner cf apart- ii~Ur;ST TI'1h
<br />rent buildings at 1?~66 W. Larpenteur, 161 ~Y. Idahc and 163: N. Snelling, SATVTTA:;.Y
<br />that Ce>uncil excuse a sanitary sew~;r penalty cY~arge in the amount of SF~,uER PE'~IAL`1'~
<br />:~6~.70. after a discussion, Counci.lmember Chestovich, seconded L-•y Couxicil- t3E EXC'J~r::D -
<br />~ember Larson, that the penalty not be excuseci. roti on carried unanimously. DENIED
<br />4ayor j'arkentie;. presented a. request from Linda Keye, 13,~~ tip. Idar~o, that :J;~i7LST F'~uCc
<br />the Ci ty reimburse her for the cost of her seV~er bac'>-up in the amount of LINDA KEYS,
<br />.135.95. Due to the fact that .ioto-Rooter cleaned out her se-cer line 135t~ IDxTiv
<br />pushing roots into the Gity line, Council:member Ghestovi.ch moved, seconded r'OIti s~IT~Irsuit-
<br />by Councilmember Larson, that the request be denied. Motion car~'i ed SET•tETuT I`Oii
<br />Sr;~vEil BACX- i;I
<br />unaz~..r,~ou s ~_ ~ .
<br />DF;Tu IED
<br />Ccuncilm~e?nber Chcstovich moved, seconded by Councilmember Eggert, that
<br />I~.IT~;TES Or'
<br />~~~~R3
<br />APPi~OVED
<br />
|