CCMin_63May15_Special - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

191l~ SPEC TAL ~'f~ETING RAY 15 , 1963 The special meeting was called to order at 8:00 P.tri. with the follawing members being present: Harold C. Nilsen, Idayor; George Shavor, Trustee;. Wi11is Warkentien, Trustee; Charles Stone, Trustee; W. A. A~ortenson, Clerk. Also present were: Brad Lemberg, Village Engineer and 1~~iichael Galvin, Village Attorney. The minutes of the previous meeting were read and approved as read. Roberts Apartment I~r. Roberts was present with his attorney, John Daubney. Permit Requests Interested residents included ~~r. and hrs. Hustrulid, R?r. Bianchi, and lt~r. and dirs. Anderson, all of Fairview Avenue. ~.ir. Daubney presented copies of the revised plan for the Roberts apartment project, with an ou~tl.ine of the project to consist of lb single bedroom apartments. Lemberg reported that he had checked the plan and that it complied with the regulations for parking and set backs and illustrated the improved effect of angle P~'• The Clerk read a letter from the Village Attorney reviearing the application for the building permit, citing applicable ordinances regarding parking space, side yards, bumper curbs and fencing, and screening and fencing around off-street parking area. Re- strictive covenants in deeds on lot lines and. set backs on other Fairview Avenue lots did not apply to this property. To enforce a 50 ft. set back along the Fairview Avenue side of the Roberts Construction Company lot would present a grave constitutional question. ~~fir. Hustrulid thought statements made in the minutes of the December 21st, 1961 hearing should be entered here in reference to the 50 ft. set back. Shavor referred to the 100 ft. distance from the back of the apartment to the end of the lot gave good protection to the other properties, and that the plan seemed to be a good one. Hustrulid felt the automobile traffic would create a problem. Nilsen recited the extent of the study made to be fair with the property owners. Daubney referred to the filling station application that was withdrawn due to objection of Fairvi~+r res- idents and changed their application to an apartment for which the land was properly zoned now and when the land was first purchased.