Laserfiche WebLink
2283 ~ I~ g~l,~ <br />Ohalmerss T think one of the questions raised on the petition <br />is valid, Hard-surfaced property should carry a <br />higher assessment. I think the school property has <br />a lot more hard surface than I have on my property. <br />Warkentiens That may be true, but it is a very difficult task to <br />get a wholly equitable distribution. <br />A show of hands indicated the following: <br />For the project as proposeds Eleven <br />Against the project as proposeds Thirteen <br />Utnes According to report, it seems to me that 75~ of the <br />people said something had to be done, Putting something <br />around the ponding area is no answer. <br />Boyds The survey made indicates the feeling of the people. <br />~tacMillens The figure of 127 is in indication to me that the people <br />in this community want something to be done, but are <br />unwilling. to accept the plan as proposed. <br />Lembergs What would you propose? Three engineers have gone into <br />this and passed on it. <br />Kurt Rydberg I suggest alternate plans and a survey of the land, <br />1771 Alberts because as it is now, some of the water is rurm ing up <br />hi7.1, The breaking point is in front of my house. <br />Wickland: We did have satisfactory drainage to the corners of <br />Holton before the unitary sewer went in. We should <br />not need that stub in there now. We would much rather <br />see the street re-graded instead. T recommdnd that a <br />further study be made, <br />Lembergs Take the 215 feet of pipe as against the cost of <br />re-grading the street. <br />Rydbergs What is the difference in cost if you dig up the street <br />and re-grade? <br />Lembergs I don't know. <br />Upon request of MacMillan, Warkentien moved, Strandquist <br />seconded that the report submitted by MacMillan, and the <br />statements made in that report, be included verbatim in <br />the~:official minutes of this meeting. Ayess Warkentien <br />and Strandquist. Abstainings Stone and Black. Due to <br />lack of a majority vote, motion was not carried. <br />(citizens' answers to inquiry were included in the envelope <br />submitted, however, there were no statements in envelope.) <br />George Anderson Is this plan going to work like at 'Shell Lake' - I don't <br />1775 Alberts see how it can help anything at Albert near Larpenteur - <br />or what we call 'Shell Lake.' <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />