Laserfiche WebLink
llla.l <br />SPECIAL MEETING JANUARY 29th, 1959. <br />Meeting was called to order at 8 P. M., the following Council Members being present: <br />Harold C. Nilsen, Mayor; George J. Shavor, Trustee; Paul L. Coppini, Trustee, and <br />Wm. R. Utecht, Clerk. Also present were Frank N. Graham, Village Attorney; Vern <br />L~ungren, Village Engineer, and Ethel E. V~hite, Deputy Clerk. Absent: Willis '~ar- <br />kentien, Trustee, and Wm. E. Olsen, Treasurer. <br />Alley V. L. Nelson, representing P.4rs. Edith Wallgren, 1358 W. Iowa, <br />Assessment ~~ D. A. Schack, 1367 W. Hoyt, and Wm. P. Carroll, 1372 W. Iowa were <br />Hearing present. Wm. Carroll stated he had been told by Paul Coppini that <br />he didn't think the price would be over X2.25 a foot and asked why <br />it was X2..82. L~ungren explained he had been asked by Coppini, be- <br />fore any tests or engineering work had been done, so the citizens <br />would have a figure to work on when soliciting signatures for the <br />petition, and. he told Coppini he didn't think it would go over X2.25 <br />based on work done on another alley a few years ago. After taking <br />testa and doing other engineering work, the estimate was revised <br />to 2.l~2 afoot. They ran into black dirt and silt pockets which <br />necessitated the removal of considerably more material than anticipated <br />and the replacement of same with suitable material which increased. the <br />Write to X2.82. <br />When asked why they hadn't made more thorough tests, L~ungren replied <br />they had made the customary tests and that it was very easy to miss <br />a silt or dirt pocket inasmuch as they were "Spotty" and did not run <br />in strata such as clay. Tests complete enough to have shown the <br />silt and dirt pockets would have simply added another $300.00 to the <br />cost. Tests would not have eliminated the necessity of removing the <br />black dirt and silt or re-filling. <br />V. L. Nelson said he had been told by Paul Coppini that they would <br />be charged for their front footage only. Coppini said he was confi- <br />dent this was the procedure mentioned as "most logical" by Attorney <br />Graham. <br />It was moved by Coppini, seconded by Utecht and unanimously voted <br />that the assessable frontage on the Edith M. Wallgren property be <br />reduced from 75.1" to 50' and that the assessable frontage on the <br />Chas. R. Kucera property be reduced from 75.1" to 50', both properties <br />being in block S Cables Hamline Heights, and that the Village absorb <br />the portion of the cost attributable to the reduction. <br />Nelson asked how the assessment ~n~ould be set up for payment. Graham <br />advised it can be paid in full without any interest at all within <br />the next thirty days to the Village Treasurer at the Village Hall. <br />After 30 days, we would certify them to the County Treasurer, the <br />first installment coming through in 1960 and running to 1969. After <br />we certify them to the County Auditor, the entire amount could be <br />paid this year but it would be necessary to pay interest from <br />January 30th to December 31st 1959. The entire amount of the balance <br />can be paid any year thereafter by paying interest to the end of the <br />year in which the final payment is made, <br />There being no further questions, the alley assessment hearing was <br />declared closed. <br />