Laserfiche WebLink
137l~ <br />Avenue, 158.62'. Your lot is 215.12' deep. We figure 126.75' <br />as normal depth, leaving at least another 88.37' lot on Fairview. <br />You would not be assessed for the 126.75' but you would be <br />assessed for 88.37' on Fairview. <br />Sipes: Haw many pieces of property will this watermain serve? <br />L3ungren: 3 lots besides yours. <br />Sipes: Don't the other people want the water extended all the way? <br />L3ungren: This petition covers only the first 1162' north of Larpenteur. <br />Sipes: How many signers did they have? <br />L~ungren: 35~ of the frontage <br />Sipes: I had a call from the owner right north of me. It is going to <br />be quite an assessment against that corner lot. '?hero families <br />would give you 35~. Is the planning finished? <br />Nilsent We have Part 1 of the report navr. It deals principally with <br />the present land use and the economic survey. The Planning <br />Consultants will meet with the Planning Board to report their <br />recommendations in about a month. <br />Dowdells I would be the last lot. Do I have to pay for the whole width <br />of the lot? <br />L~ungren: You would be assessed for your whole frontage now, but nothing <br />more when the watermain is laid the rest of the way up the <br />street. <br />Nilsens We all know and realize the ideal situation would have been to <br /> extend the water as the village was developed, but the City of <br /> St. Paul wouldn't agree to further extension until recently. <br /> Nair we have the problem of double expense. It seems foolish <br /> and costly to permit people to drill wells and then come along <br /> with the watermain in another year or so. The watermain is on <br /> Larnenteur Avenue paw and available to the side streets. Our <br /> thought has been that the extension of water along Fairview and <br /> Tatum would have to wait until a representative percentage of <br /> the people wanted water. An informal petition was taken on <br /> Fairview, north of Dowdell's, but most of the people felt their <br /> wells were satisfactory and they were hesitant about taking <br /> on the additional expense of hooking up to the City Water so <br /> soon after laying sewers, and that's the situation we have to <br /> face. On Tatum, a small percentage would like to see the water <br /> go up the street, but it is a real problem. <br />Bianchis Is it more expensive to out water down a street where there are <br /> houses only on one side? <br />Nilsens Yes, it is. It was true of the sanitary sewer system and it is <br />true of the water <br />oin <br />down La <br />t <br />I <br /> g <br />g <br />rpen <br />eur. <br />f we could put a <br /> main down the middle of the street and service both sides, it <br /> would be less costly. <br />Question: What if the University should develop on the East side of Fairview? <br />