Laserfiche WebLink
11].8 <br />Johnson I think this Council should. act one way or the other. Either vacate <br />it, or vacate it and dedicate it as a walkway or we are ant to have <br />the sa^~e thine coming up year after ,year. <br />Warkentien We can't bind future councils. <br />Uteeht No, we can't bind future councils. <br />L. Pehrson I am not really affected. one way or the other but I feel it <br />1766 Holton would. be a fine gesture to vacate the alley in favor of the <br />property owners. I would like to see it vacated. <br />Geo. Anderson It really doesn't affect me one way or the other. I don't have <br />1775 Albert any small children, but there were times when the only way we <br />could get on to Albert was through that lane. Tha±- was the only <br />time we used it. I have heard. from my neighbors that their <br />children use it. They go up the alley and don't have to go down <br />to Larpen teur. <br />Nilsen It gets them off the traveled part of the street. <br />Uteeht I am in favor of stopping travel but I still think the kids should <br />be allowed to walk through. Let's barricade it in the middle, <br />Pars. Salminen Alleys are very dangerous. We have lots of little toddlers - <br />maybe their mothers should watch them all the time, but they don't. <br />Salminen It is an intrusion on your privacy. Vie might be sitting out <br />there enjoying a barbecue dinner and someone goes through and <br />raises the dust. <br />Coppini I still move we vacate this alley in favor of the property owners. <br />Coppini Previous councils have been negligent on these other walkways as <br />evidenced by the planners regarding an entrance to the walkway on <br />Ruggles. <br />Uteeht Let's refer it to the Planning Commission and see what they say. <br />dirs. Salminen Wasn't the letter Mr. Cor~pini read. from the Planning Commission? <br />Uteeht No, they are planne rs but not our Planning Commission. <br />Nilsen named the members of the Village planning Commission and <br />said it is well not to be too hasty because when they had the hearing <br />on the walkway between Holton and Pascal, at about Ruggles, there were <br />no objectors at the first meeting, but at the second meeting those <br />who attended were mostly objectors. <br />?rs. Salminen If there are objectors, why aren't they here? The notice was <br />posted and published and I also gave the matter a lot of publicity. <br />Uteeht Our normal procedure is to turn this over to our Planning Commission <br />and get their opinion. <br />Nilsen Ts there a second to Coppini's motion? None was heard. Nilsen <br />announced Conpini's motion dies for lack of a second. <br />