Laserfiche WebLink
1546 <br />___-} <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED. by the Village Council <br />of the Village of Falcon Heights, P~Zinnesota: <br />1. The Village Council finds that the original <br />Watermain Improvement of 1960, No. 1 assessment of $551.25 <br />for Lot 19, Block 1, Barthel Villas Addition was and is <br />excessive considering that the Village refuses to issue <br />a building permit on this lot, and this lot is hereby <br />found to have no benefit from the said improvement at the <br />present time. <br />2. Upon reassessment, the Council finds that the <br />assessment roll for Watermain Improvement of 1900, No. 1 <br />approved by this Council on October l7, 1960 with respect <br />to Lot 19, Block 1, Barthel Villas Addition, should be <br />changed and this lot reassessed to show no 'aenefits to <br />this lot and no assessment against this lot upon the under- <br />standing that when the Village Council will authorize the <br />issuance of a building permit on this lot the original <br />assessment will be reinstated upon notice and hearing. <br />3. The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and <br />directed to prepare a certified copy of this resolution <br />and to deliver the same to the County Auditor of Ramsey <br />County and to do any and all things necessary to see that <br />the reassessment of Lot 19, Block 1, Barthel Villas <br />Addition herein made, is entered upon the necessary books <br />and records of the County Auditor. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was <br />seconded by Nilsen and unanimously carried. <br />Trial Costs: Letter of December 27th from Attorney ~3ernard P. Friel <br />was read. Letter advised: ''It is my opinion tha+, the <br />costs of nrosecutin~ such cases are, if the defendant <br />is convicted, chargeable to the defendant. Especially <br />excluded., however, from the costs which can be taxed to <br />the defendant are the costs of drunkometer test, blood <br />analysis and urine analysis. It does not appear that <br />gratuitous fees paid ~~ritnesses can properly be taxed <br />nor can the fees of the sher~_ff for service of papers <br />and. mileage. In the absence of conviction, no costs may <br />be assessed. It is my advice that the Justice should <br />charge all costs to the defendant at the time of convic- <br />tion end he should then turn over all of the sums taxed <br />to the Villa.~e office. The Village office should, in <br />turn, make the necessary disbursements. 'i'he expenses of <br />serving papers and attorney's fees are not recoverable <br />from the defendant anal in every case these expenses ~~vill <br />be chargeable to the Village. The -eputy Clerk was <br />instructed to send copies of Friel's letter to Justices <br />Johnson :end Stougaard. Gonpini moved that the Justices <br />be advised that the Council recommends that the procedure <br />as outlined be followed. Seconded by Utecht and car:^ied. <br />Audit Utecht reported he had contacted Haskins & Sells, Certified <br />