Laserfiche WebLink
1694 <br />Lauer: <br />Emil Andersonz <br />1717 Fairview <br />At the present time, do <br />double bungalows live in <br />ovrner lives on one side <br />I would propose the use <br />if it would be possible <br />Sommers. <br />the olvners of the duplexes and <br />t-here? Atilsen; Yes, the <br />ar,~? rents the other. <br />1 <br />E Anderson: <br />'ldalt er Sipe: <br />of R-2 as a buffer. I yonder <br />to use R-2 South of P~Zrs. <br />I think introducing rental properties would down-grade the <br />Vi::.1aF.e as a whole. I think the property on the corner of <br />Larnenteur and Fairview should be made R-2. <br />I own that corner and I would object to R-2. <br />Lauer: I think the people who bought and built their homes under <br />the impression that the prox~erty v4~as R-1 v-ould be Haying a <br />penalty. T +hink the corner at Fairvietiv and Larnenteur <br />should be R-2. That vrould at least give them some buffer. <br />Schwantes: I don't see any objection to the R-2 on the Greenhouse <br />property. <br />Janos: i~dhat was the reason for changing tha±. street and bringing it <br />in on Tatum? ti'hy couldn't it go straight to Larnenteur? <br />Nilsen: I feel that it was a mistake +„hat Crawford wasn't <br />extended to Fry years ago. Novrvre have heavy traffic going <br />through ;Taple Knoll. I feel vre should have a street <br />system that wi_l enable traffic to move without injuring <br />residential areas. Labalcstra: V;e have a 12' walkway on <br />my lots. .Nilsen: ~TTe have hid other walkways in the <br />Village and have b.en petitioned by +.,he property ov~~ners to <br />have them vacated. u,re haven't been able to vacate them rut <br />we have put traffic restrictions on them. That is the <br />best we can d.o until we have sidewalks on Larnenteur. <br />Curtis Larsen, Regarding the East and ti~est Street, I am representing a <br />1885 Tatum: group that. feels vre need an access to the playground area. <br />so tha+., vrhen children ~f~ant to skate in the winter time, <br />they will not have to :~ralk so far nor on the Heavily <br />traveled streets. I think it might be desirable to have <br />access to that ska±ing rink farther North. <br />Janos: ~lthen you nut in a nevr street and someone finds+hat, because <br />of it, he is on ? corner lot, do his taxes go up? <br />Nilsen: Yes, but on assessments for water and. sewer vre <br />have charged for just the frontage. Sidewalks and curbs, <br />if put in, would be assessed for depth and width of lot. <br />Emil Anderson: This 33' niece of land that Lindig owns, next to ?=qrs. <br />Sommers' property, is left out of the prey ent zoning? <br />Nilsen: The ordinance ca~_ls for ~0' variance one vray <br />or another. It could fell v~ri±,hin R-2 or R-l. An.~erson: <br />Or R-3? Cartwright: idot without a public hearing and <br />rezoning. Andersen: Now .bout narking? Cartwright: It <br />ti°rill '~~e the typ<. of action on which the Council ~~~ri11 have <br />to post notices ar.~a send notices to all property ovrners. <br />1 <br />1 <br />