CCMin_87Apr8 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 8, 1987 PAGE 3 ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS DEFERRED Council discussed allocation of funds to capital improvements, and the present balances in Fire/Rescue, Park/Recreation and Public Works improvement funds. Council concurred 50% of any excess contingency fund should be distributed to the various improvement funds and will study the matter further after obtaining additional information relating to sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and general street improvement funds. PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT RELATING TO REGULATION OF PLUMBING, CHAPTER 5, PART 10 Council briefly discussed amendment of portions of Chapter 5, Part 5-10.01 of the code as recommended in a staff memo dated April 2, 1987, indicating portions of this section are no longer applicable and one section was inadvertantly deleted in the codification process. Chenoweth moved, seconded by Ciernia adoption of Ordinance No. 0-87-3 ORDINANCE 0-87-3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PORTIONS OF PART 9, SECTION 5-10.01 RELATING TO REGULATION OF PLUMBING PAY SCHEDULE ESTABLISHED FOR CABLE TV ACCESS TECHNICIANS Baldwin explained it has not been possible to arrange a meeting of the City's Cable Access Committee (this body was to recommend a pay schedule), and since the technicians have received no payment, he was presenting a proposed schedule. Baldwin recommended Council adopt a schedule and direct the Committee to do the fine tuning. Hard felt the schedule should be established by the Committee, not Council. Baldwin moved, seconded by Chenoweth, adoption of the proposed pay schedule. Upon a vote being taken the following voted in favor thereof: Baldwin, Ciernia, Chenoweth, and Wallin, and the following voted against the same: Hard. Motion carried. BRIGGS & MORGAN STATEMENT DISCUSSED - CHARGES FOR ATTORNEY PERFORMANCE REVIEW TO BE DELETED Baldwin felt the legal firm's charge for a performance review was inappropriate as the reviews were established to discuss and improve the firm's performance and relationship with the city. Baldwin recommended that charge be deducted from the payment. He also explained the city had previously paid for a similar review due to the fact that only he would have known the purpose of the meeting, and he was not in attendance at the meeting when the charges were approved. Following a short discussion Chenoweth moved, seconded by Wallin, deletion of the charges for review, cancellation of Check ~~20271 dated April 8, 1987, and issuance of another check reflecting the deletion of the charges for the performance review. Motion carried unanimously. Council concurred direction for legal work must come only from Council and staff. ADJOURNMENT Hard moved, seconded by Ciernia, adjournment at 9:19 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. 2~