Laserfiche WebLink
~.~ ~, <br />L.A. Rossiter 1300 Harmon, Place, Minneapolis, Standard Oil Company representative, <br />inquired as to proposed license fees and period covered. <br />H.P. Bruncke 1710 N. Albert, asked if additions could be made to the proposed <br />ordinance for control of 2!t-hour parking of trailers and trucks. <br />Trustee Shavor inquired whether a filling station business includedzenting of <br />trailers, selling used care~Attorney Graham stating no ordinance <br />provision precluded a station operator from doing so. <br />Mr. Rossiter inquired how different hours of operation could apply to different <br />stations. As examples, Trustee Cartwright cited one station <br />surrounded by Residence A properties where 2!t-hour operation would <br />interfere with children in the area getting their proper restf-with <br />another station in a 100 commercial area where there would be no <br />reason for limiting hours of operation on the basis of public health. <br />Harry Franklin, Secretary, Ramsey County Petroleum Retailers Association, questioned <br />the authority of the Village tb fix different closing hours for one <br />filling station as against another. Attorney Graham replied that <br />the council has the power to limit the hours of operation of a filling <br />station, and in a proper situation it is not unconstitutional. <br />Samuel J. Cavallaro, 1697 N. Hamline, inquired regarding provisions for hearings on <br />license applications. <br />Raymond ~S3y, 1365 ~, Larpenteur, inquired as to the number of filling stations <br />that may be permitted to operate in the Village, and. was advised <br />that the council does not have the power to limit the number of <br />stations, <br />Mr. Rossiter stated that if the council has general powers, would it be necessary <br />to mention in the ordinance the matter of regulating hours of <br />operation. He was informed that this was specified in the proposed <br />ordinance at the councils request. <br />Mr. Franklin said he had talked with some of the dealers about the licensing <br />provision and that the dealers expressed the opinion the Village needs <br />money and probably will license all bum.-Hess. In doing so, he said <br />the license fee should"be on the same level for each business, <br />Attorney Graham reported that in charging a license fee, that it is <br />not for revenue purposes, but for policing and looking after the <br />general welfare of the Village, covering the cost of Fire Department <br />inspections and approximating the cost of seeing that the ordinance <br />provisions are carried out. A comparison with other business would <br />have to be on the basis of the cost of regulating other businesses, <br />the attorney said. <br />Mr. Rossiter questioned that the applicant for a license should be required <br />to see that all real and personal property taxes assessed against <br />the filling station property have o will be paid, In replying, <br />it was pointed out that. the owner of a property would be receiving <br />his rent from the operator of the station, and. in a situation of <br />that kind. that no one should be allowed to let the taxes go where <br />there is money available. <br />L.T. Gasink 1402 @Y, Larpenteur, who arrived at the meeting after the point <br />had been discussed, inquired as to restrictions on types of <br />business which a filling station may operate, such as a garage. <br />