My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda_04Jul28
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda Packets
>
200x
>
2004
>
CCAgenda_04Jul28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 2:30:41 PM
Creation date
6/24/2009 4:51:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• IP Telephony Analysis <br />July 28, 2004 <br /> # of Phones Capital cost Maintenance Annual Phone <br /> costs char es <br />Current System 20 $16,790.06 2001-$1,507.80 2001-$10,989.57 <br />(1997) 2002-$2,816.07 2002-$11,170.98 <br /> 2003-$1,023.96 2003-$11,199.94 <br /> Total-$5,347.83 Total-$33,360.49 <br /> <br />Voice over 20 + analog $6,580 $2,500 (flat $420.00/month <br />Internet Protocol adapters (2) annual support (toll) <br />System (2004) service fee) $5,040 annually <br /> $3,300 (one- + $720.00* <br />Remote Site time) Total--$7,540 <br />Survivability (includes support <br />(router) Total: $9,880 service fee) <br />Notes• <br />• Neither cost includes long distance, which is separate and is charged at approximately 5 cents per <br />minute, depending on calling area and time of day. <br />*City will retain one hard-line connection, which will cost approximately $60.00 per month. <br />Advantages• <br />IP Telephony is cheaper to utilize on a monthly basis, as eliminates the need for individual <br />business phone lines. The city can expect to save roughly $4,000 to $5,000 per year on the <br />system for operating costs. <br />IP telephony technology enables the city to have an automatic redundancy in our phone system. <br />If city hall is unavailable, we can log-onto the phone system in any one of the other five cities <br />who participate in this system, and have access to our voicemail and take calls at that alternate <br />location, much like we can with the Roseville computer network currently. <br />IP has a wider range of features, including Caller ID, hold and transfer functions, and a larger <br />number of possible extensions and voicemail boxes (for staff who don't need a physical "phone" <br />but would like to have remote access to a voicemail box, such as building inspector, fire <br />inspector, etc...) <br />Sound quality and reliability have been excellent in Roseville's system, by all accounts. The <br />• projected costs of this system have dropped substantially, due to the larger participation by other <br />municipalities. <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.