My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda_03Aug29_wksp
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda Packets
>
200x
>
2003
>
CCAgenda_03Aug29_wksp
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2009 8:39:08 AM
Creation date
6/26/2009 9:06:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• person with recreation experience and clerical experience. Additionally, we had some <br />concerns about continuation of service under a combined recreation/clerical position- <br />. primarily that the recreation coordinator's busiest time is the spring and summer, and that <br />would basically leave Mary, Roland and myself without any support in those very busy <br />months (building permits, budget-time, etc...). I think we've come up with a good <br />compromise solution, and this will add only about 3/4 of a full-time equivalent to our <br />staffing level. <br />In addition, you will see a recommended 3% increase in employee compensation for <br />2004. As always, I am concerned about retaining the high-quality, hard working <br />employees that we have, and I made some other adjustments in the budget (cutting other <br />line items, looking for additional revenue sources), in order to offer a more attractive <br />compensation amount to our employees. I continue to believe that our employees are our <br />strongest asset, and I am concerned that we may not be competitive with other cities in <br />the metro our size, so I am looking for your support in helping to retain them through a <br />3% increase in 2004. <br />In addition, we did think of another capital item for next year-new accounting software <br />for Roland. The current system is DOS based, and the supplier is probably going to <br />begin phasing out support of the system in the next year or so. This is a large <br />expenditure, although Roland and I are investigating other options as well. We just want <br />to make sure there is a placeholder in the budget if we need to replace it next year. <br />• This budget represents a flat levy-the same rate we used last year. If there is an <br />increase, it would be directly attributed to the county's valuation of the property o~-- <br />there will be no levy increase on the part of the city through its levy. We have some <br />preliminary numbers from the County, which we are working on. Roland and I will have <br />that info for you at the meeting-it came in too late this week for us to include. <br />Additionally, we saw a small increase in our fiscal disparities allocation. <br />You have also requested a 10% reduction budget. Unfortunately, I did not have time to <br />complete that this week. I will try to have this done by Wednesday evening. It will not <br />vary too much from that of 2003. <br />Please note that we saved nearly $12,000 in our parks and recreation program this year- <br />due to staff recommendations about coaching levels, programming, and fees. I am very <br />proud of Bill and Diane for making these changes and saving a substantial sum in the <br />process. This is reflected in the Parks Programs Special Revenue Fund. <br />I think that is about it please call me on Tuesday if you have any questions. Have a <br />great long weekend! <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.