My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_95Jun26
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
199x
>
1995
>
PCAgenda_95Jun26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2009 8:31:16 AM
Creation date
7/6/2009 4:15:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. "Undue hardship" means: • <br />- The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used <br />under conditions allowed by the official controls, <br />- The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the <br />property not created by the landowner, <br />- The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the <br />locality, and <br />- Economic considerations alone will not constitute an undue hardship if <br />reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the <br />ordinance.14 <br />3. The first part of the definition does not mean that the applicant must <br />show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the <br />variance. Rather, the applicant may show that it would like to use the <br />property in a reasonable manner that is prohibited by the ordinance. <br />"Practical difficulties" may justify a variance, including functional and <br />aesthetic concerns.'s <br />4. The applicant has a heavier burden to establish the need for a variance • <br />than a conditional use permit because a variance allows something <br />which is otherwise prohibited by the ordinance.16 <br />5. A variance cannot be granted for a use which is not permitted in the <br />applicable zoning district." <br />6. A variance to allow construction on a substandard lot is not required <br />when the lot had been in common ownership with an adjacent <br />substandard lot. This is true even if the lot. has been sold.1e <br />7. When the property owner knew or should have known at the time of <br />purchase that the use was prohibited by the zoning ordinance, the <br />hardship was created by the landowner, and no variance should be <br />granted.t9 <br />8. A prior erroneous application of the zoning ordinance cannot be used <br />to require a city to grant a variance.20 <br />9. Economic reasons are not a basis for a variance.2t <br />4 <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.