PCAgenda_92Apr27 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Maple Knolls PUD 4/22/92 Page 2 • roadways that will need to be put into the covenants governing the project. We have not reviewed a copy of the proposed covenants yet. Design Considerations 1) Overall, the buildings will be attractive and well-designed and would be a welcome addition to the community. Rottlund has a good reputation and is building a project (of 112 units) in Roseville, at Highway 36 and Dale Street. The units there are similar, but not identical, to the ones proposed for Maple Knolls. 2) The buildings are placed on the site at various angles. While there may be situations where this is warranted, we believe an arrangement that would line the buildings up more closely with the right angles of the property lines would make just as much sense on this property and would eliminate the condition where the outdoor patio area is as close as 5 feet to the roadway. There is ample room on the site to keep this dimension at a minimum of 15 feet in all cases. At the very least, aligning the buildings with consistent angles would be an improvement. The narrative supplied by Rottlund indicates that the angled placement is to improve solar gain to as many units as possible. In the design they propose, the northerly unit would receive practically no winter sun at all, whereas if the buildings were aligned straight north and south, the northeast and northwest units would receive at least some morning or some afternoon winter sun. 3) Parking for the project appears to be adequate. The Ordinance requires 2.5 spaces per unit, and Maple Knolls will have 4 spaces per unit, excluding any parking on the private road. All fourplex units have atwo-car garage and space for two more to park in the driveway. The 8-unit building has two-car garages for the 4 corner units and one-car garages for the 4 interior units, also with an equal number of spaces in the driveways. The plans note the possibility of parking on one side of the private road. We would recommend this only if the roadway were widened to 30 feet from the proposed 24-foot width. 4) Landscaping The landscaped screening of drive and parking adjacent to Prior Avenue is generally adequate. However, this could be enhanced with the addition of some shrub massing along the north edge of drive and west edge of parking. The landscaped screening/buffer along the eastern boundary appears to be generally adequate. Screening along this boundary adjacent to the fire station, near the entrance to the project, will lessen the impact of the fire station storage area. However, to adequately buffer this activity, the City will have to clean up the storage yard and plant landscaping on the fire station property in this area. The landscaped screening buffer along the southern boundary appears adequate. The landscaped screening along the western boundaries needs additional overstory/evergreen plantings along the walkway/emergency vehicle access to buffer the residential neighborhood across the low area to the west. The western boundary along the existing office development needs additional evergreen and shrub plantings to adequately screen the offices and parking from view. The area along the northern boundary between the proposed development and the office complex needs substantially more plantings. This area serves as the visual focal point for the existing • office development. The terraced walls should be heavily landscaped to enhance its functions as