Laserfiche WebLink
designated parkland in the comprehensive plan. <br />3. The provision of an LRT zone requires some discussion. Obviously, <br />LRT planning is a regional plan and the provisions in the city's <br />comprehensive plan may never come to pass. (The LRT is- substantially <br />expensive and controversial.) However, its inclusion in the plan is <br />important since its presence has major implications for at least a <br />portion of the city. Metro Council will be carefully reviewing <br />the plan to assure that the LRT question is clearly addressed. <br />These are a few points to discuss: <br />* Does the city support LRT development? <br />* At this time is Snelling the best route through the City? <br />* LRT Stop at Snelling and Larpenteur. <br />Stressing the importance of a stop at Snelling and Larpenteur <br />in the plan may assist with its reality in the future. The <br />absence of a stop here would mean that the LRT would probably <br />not bring much direct additional development to the area. <br />* Redevelopment of the southeast corner of Snellino and Larpenteur <br />The LRT zone in the plan may have little impact on the existing <br />land use and development trends with the exception of the <br />southeast corner of Snelling and Larpenteur. As stated in the <br />plan, if redeveloped the corner should meet the high density <br />demands and setbacks of property across the street from an <br />LRT station. Although this may occur, rigidly applying these <br />standards might preclude any development on this corner until <br />LRT becomes a near reality, possibly twenty years. There <br />are also no guarantees that this corner will be a stop. <br />One might also make the case that the market demands associated <br />with a major transportation shift, like LRT, will create • <br />a shift in land use once the line is close to being a reality, <br />regardless of the existing land use. On the other hand, having <br />a development that is consistent with future density around an <br />LRT might eliminate another phase of development. <br />Hollvwood Court stability <br />The LRT zone should be designated in a manner that doesn't affect <br />the public's perception of the stability of the Hollywood Court <br />neighborhood. Due to the tenuousness of the LRT plan and stops, it <br />would be undesirable to give homeowners and future homeowners the <br />impression that the neighborhood is imminently subject to change <br />when there are so many variables out of the city's control in LRT <br />planning and siting. <br />4. The implementation strategies dealing with smaller lot sizes and <br />and "cottages" to accommodate aging family members and non two <br />parent headed households. (Attachment 2) <br />Fred Hoisington convincingly suggested that local land use patterns <br />should increasingly accommodate different family styles for a <br />population and society that does not have the affluence or spending <br />power of the 1980'x. He proposed smaller lots, and apartments and <br />cottages for aging family members. What does this mean <br />for Falcon Heights? <br />To respond to this suggestion it is important to put Falcon Heights in <br />a metropolitan perspective. The following points are important in <br />assessing the city's housing competitiveness and strength over the <br />• <br />