My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_91Aug26
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
199x
>
1991
>
PCAgenda_91Aug26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2009 3:21:54 PM
Creation date
7/7/2009 1:44:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• coming decade. <br />* The majority of Falcon Heights homes are small and on lots <br />under 10,000 sq. ft. Falcon Heights housing values have been <br />increasing at approximately 4 percent in 1990 and 19-91. They <br />are higher than other north suburban cities outside of Arden <br />Hills because of location and neighborhood quality. Many <br />families are choosing to settle here. Many homeowners also <br />consider these to be "starter" homes and move to newer houses on <br />larger lots when financially able. <br />* The housing market will experience a significant shift over the <br />next decade with the baby boomers, the major housing buyers over <br />the past two decades, settling down or buying a larger home. Metro <br />council anticipates a drop of 22$ in the first time buyer market <br />where historically Falcon Heights falls (although many homeowners <br />stay here). There will be an increase of 22$ in the "move-up buyer" <br />or people looking for larger homes probably in Shoreview, Eagan, <br />Plymouth etc. <br />The housing market is already experiencing a drop in the rental <br />market since the young renter age group has fallen by 14~. <br />This is already apparent in Falcon Heights where 27$ of the city's <br />housing is non-University rental units. In a survey of <br />landlords last fall, the staff found that landlords were <br />experiencing vacant units for the first time in their memory. <br />* The city will inevitably experience more impact from the <br />demographic changes in the central city population due to <br />its location on the central city's border. <br />* To some extent the city's R-1 zone accommodates "mother-in-law" <br />apartments and differing family arrangements, such as group homes and <br />two women living with their children, through its definition of <br />family, which is four unrelated adults. However, the added <br />apartments cannot be totally separate from the rest of the <br />household because it requires shared cooking facilities. <br />Flexibility in the application of this might accommodate some family <br />arrangement's better. <br />The city's location adjacent to the University makes its households <br />desirable for student renters. This is not necessarily to the <br />detriment of the community 's neighborhoods. However, permanent <br />apartment arrangements and small dwellings originally constructed <br />for aging family members to live in for the remaining years of <br />their life, may become rental units for the population as a whole. <br />This need not have a negative impact. However, it may change the <br />composition of housing units in R-1 neighborhoods. <br />Finally, it is important to realize that change is inevitable. The city <br />will increasingly house different family styles and demographic groups. <br />The intent of the plan should not be to eliminate this change in the <br />city's population, but to accommodate it without sacrificing <br />neighborhood quality or reducing its desirability in the metropolitan <br />housing market. <br />5. The proposed zoning district classifications (Attachment 3) <br />* B-1 A to B-1 - makes sense to keep similar businesses zoned together. <br />• The B-lA allows for multi-family residential uses with a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.