My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCAgenda_90Oct22
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
199x
>
1990
>
PCAgenda_90Oct22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2009 3:12:50 PM
Creation date
7/7/2009 2:43:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ ~ t I <br />5. Public Utilities. <br />Public sewer and water are already connected to lots 43 and <br />44. New sewer and water connections would be necessary to a • <br />new structure along Garden. Electricity and telephone hook- <br />ups would be necessary. However, the availability of these <br />services to adjacent properties should make this fairly <br />simple. <br />6. Access <br />Access to the new lot is directly south off of Garden <br />Avenue. <br />7. Impact on adjoining neighbors. <br />Neighboring property owners will view a house rather than <br />open space from their rear yard. <br />8. Conformity with adjacent lots and lots within the immediate <br />area. <br />The proposed subdivision of two large lots at the north end <br />of the block between Albert Street and Hamline Avenue will <br />create three smaller lots. The lots on the east side of <br />Albert and west side of Hamline are unusually long, <br />approximately 250 feet, with the exception of the lots along <br />Larpenteur. <br />There are examples of similar small sized lots within the • <br />adjacent blocks to this proposed subdivision. <br />9. Conformity with comprehensive plan. <br />The current comprehensive plan does not specifically address <br />subdividing of existing lots for single family homes. <br />Subdividing existing lots may increase the number of <br />households in the city and add new housing stock to a <br />developed community. It may also create a mish-mash of <br />inconsistent lots and higher than desired density on some <br />blocks. Therefore, it will be useful to address these type <br />of requests with policies, followed by a subdivision <br />ordinance of existing lots. <br />The Commission's comments upon Mr. Warkentien's proposal and <br />experience with these requests will assist me in reviewing this <br />request and preparing a larger policy document and, possible, <br />ordinance. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.