|
V
<br />I ~ ~ ~ F , F'
<br />c) A ~tPlcdl~'" pne+`~aaa~.l~.~^$.~~~ibn would
<br />,..,.
<br />a c}c o m o d a~,~t a about ~'7,~ ~~~"~ e d ~ ~ .~, t~ `' t
<br />~~F;~ ., _ ,ed .and ao.i".~QWmGt~'C-' an. ~p6~4'~iA'~ ,~1~i~1~~ng
<br />~ .i~:' p, ~~. ~' ~T"`~g!~,,:~.,~,
<br />' Thus ~t.•4~e. " ,ie~f fi i c i e n t <i ' u ®e '~ ' t. ~Zk ~
<br />e~ .~~:~ ~ ,e~~~~~,M~,~ h a t ~s u e,~ n . the i~~ y
<br />p 't'o e'r
<br />5 The .~, ~ ~ * ~~,~:,,~,,, ,~
<br />• e n'~. a
<br />vi ed :,wr,v~~v ~ ~ . d.x~:~,~~' ~~ and d~.~$'> ",~~? p r°,»
<br />d ~dB~~ although not as ~. '=g~~J~
<br />as might be pose ble u~~,~y"r; "x~,,. t,
<br />opinion is subject to comments from the City Eng~,neer with
<br />respect to utility easements and engineerin u dness of
<br />draina a and ondin °K" "~~ ~• .
<br />.; ,, F,U. P g • ~,'~~, however, ~n
<br />s:
<br />l~
<br />~~~ fi;~ili~ ,~ g P ~n " "„
<br />by the ~~~~,~~' r•a~e~e]„opa- special attention
<br />s ould be pa to screen a cul-de-sacs- from homes
<br />to the east. TY~~.s ,area should be so designed as to pia
<br />~ ~ ..
<br />~'°Land along the east border is ideally suited .„form ~~,--w•~"~"'
<br />use by both existing and future residents wi't;ti '"'" ~`
<br />.. .. ,; .
<br />~~. ,~/' e J" ~~°,~~~~f~~~~ 't h e t r a i l
<br />_vl"- shou a provi ed some type of surface for
<br />_1 ~ y~'~ ~ ~ ~~ and t~~~ cs-~~ax~1;~~.~.'~ ,t ~ r' ~t z ~ d) use .
<br />,C1"~ V' ~ Common open space to the south may be used for both
<br />~ ~ ponding and recreation; a specif-ic plan for development
<br />„~"~ ', should be required.
<br />(~ 6. As 'designed, the zero lot line plat does not provlide "dispersed"
<br />common open space as might be done with townhomes• i~t its sug-,
<br />~ Bested, then, that a condition be to'~B,Q',~",~~pm- `gg~ e
<br />for active or assive recreation) ~o` a". ~„'~t"~'"~~ `~ ~Cn~$he ~~ ~^~
<br />~w. . ~ ., "
<br />fi r they r~ ""' ;^~ . m.~,
<br />a'
<br />~,. M , , ~,
<br />.~~ ~ .. v
<br />7. he remaining s of""vacant land in the total develop-
<br />~U~ ment area ~ ~ in accordance with one of several
<br />.
<br />dens ty optio ernatives that have been """' " '°''
<br />'~ $. Based upon the criteria submitted by me and the Task Force
<br />~.,
<br />,.
<br />b ,.
<br />' it is suggested that an o e ing~ ' " '~"
<br />~~ ~~. .
<br />:r: , ..,~. ,.: r
<br />-
<br />hen total pro~`e ~ ~ensity excee e a w c
<br />could be ccomodated by a " standard " subdivisioln under
<br />R-l~density standards.
<br />RECOMMENDATION
<br />Subject to the conditions,npte~ierein and,~recommenda ,.~f
<br />• the City Enginner, ~ "a~mQnd~~- ` " '' '
<br />
|