My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCRes_82-20
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
198x
>
1982
>
CCRes_82-20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 10:09:01 AM
Creation date
7/9/2009 4:00:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,•_ <br />ti <br />3. Criteria now under study must be applied to the specific <br />land in question since no other large land parcel is avails- • <br />ble for private development in Falcon Heights and may not <br />properly apply to smaller developrnents that could occur else- <br />where in the Community. Further, time and circumstances will <br />not allow such standarcts to be enacted into law for applica- <br />tion to the land in question. A5 such, any criteria developed <br />now must be considered a:; spec.ltic "guidelines" for use by <br />the Planning Commission and City Council in evaluating develop- <br />ment plans currently being submitted for approval by Che land <br />owners. <br />~4. Since the land may or may not be developed under a "PUD" <br />Permit, criteria should apply to other possible procedures <br />such as a rezoning, large scale subdivision plat, or other . <br />possible administrativ~r ;ippruach to approval of a develop- <br />. meet plan. Iu other words, criteria employed should result <br />in sound and good land use regardless of the approval method <br />utilized. <br />The basic approach here is to utilize the criteria recommended by <br />the Tatum Woods Neighborhood `Task Force as the foundation for my <br />recommendations but with modifications, deletions, and augmenta- <br />tion I believe to be appropriate and in the geriera~.'public interest. <br />Also, I have included some sketches that illustrate the number <br />of dwelling units that may result by location in utilization of <br />criteria hereinafter suggested. <br />SUGGESTED_I'LnN__l~,vnl.un'l_L_uN C12I'lE1tIA . <br />1. Relationship to existing single-.family development. <br />a. Land Use. ~ <br />1) Uses adjacent to existing single-family homes should <br />be either single-larnily detached or 2-story (maximum <br />height) townhomes, "zero lot line" development, du- <br />` plexes, or similar type housing. <br />2) If more than one type of housing is proposed, low <br />density types should be .located at the north and <br />east portions of the site with higher density types <br />located to the south and west. <br />b. Setbacks at p~~,erimcter of site. <br />1) If single family detached. homes are placed adjacent <br />to existing homes, the existing zoning required set- <br />, back should apply. llwelliug units within 130 feet of <br />:.~ north and east property lines should not be per- <br />t milted in excess of one (1) dwelling unit per 10,000 <br />sy. ft. of net (excluding public streets) residential <br />land. Net r~sidcntial land would include any utility <br />or other ea~,emeuts, comuwn open space, or similar land. <br />2) The required rear yard setback shall be doubled for <br />any alt-ached dwelling units (duplexes, townhomes, <br />quads, etc.) except that one (1) such dwelling unit • <br />may be located at the required zoning setback at in- <br />tervals of not less than 75 feet of property line. <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.