CCRes_82-20 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

a ~- s ~t,. c. Screening. ,~ 1. 50% perimeter screening of. non-single family uses should be provided with existing or new ,plant materials, landscaped bermi.ng, or s:Lmilar approved methods. Good, •~ existing plant materials should be retained at the site when practicab.lu and feasible at the perimeter and elsewhere on the site. F. 2. No vehicular parking area of 5 or more cars should be visible from existing ho}nes as viewed from a height of six (6) feet above the ground. Screening shall be an evergreen or other effective material or ap- proved technique for year round screening of car headlights;. there should be at least a ~5~ screen to a minimum of five. (5) foot height. d. Access. . 1. Proper access to the existing City Park in the area should be maint~il.nud for all existing and pgtential future residents oP the general. z~'eighborhooc~. 2. Pedestrian and bicycle (non-motor.zed) access to near- by streets (both to the north and east ~.f possible) should be accomudated. 3. All possible eE[orts to obtain access to Cleveland Ave. should be pursued if projected traffic volumes to be generated by development of the subject'site may re- suit in thru-traffic onto existing residential streets • in excess (as J~c~r normal st~indards employed by Traffic Engineers) of th,~t which cou.Ld normally be accomodated on such residential streets in terms of the public health, safety, and general welfare. If development of the subject property may result in excessively high traffic volumes onto existing residential streets, vehicular connections to existing single-family home • areas shall be li.mitud to use for emergency situations and. pedestrian and bike (non-motorized)`access. e. Solar Access. To~the extent feasible ~~nd practicable, soldr access to existing single-family homes shall be protected in accor- dance with provisions of the Comprehensive City Plan and a licable State Statutes. PP ?, Density/Use Intensity. ~ a. .All or portions of the subject property may';be developed in strut accordance WLCtl provisions of the existing zoning although such a "typical." single-family home subdivision is not considered the most efficient nor economical way to utilize the laud nor would such a _ "typical" development bust servo the City's land use, population, and huusiu~; policies and objeckives as stated in the Comprehensive Municipal lluvelopment`,Plan. • b. A satisfactory and desirable development and env~.ronment in the general public interest could be Achieved by a "transitional" approach to dwelling unit density as fo'.lows: -3-