My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRCAgenda_91Apr8
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Parks and Rec Commission
>
Parks and Rec. Com. Packets
>
199x
>
1991
>
PRCAgenda_91Apr8
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2009 1:37:29 PM
Creation date
7/15/2009 1:37:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. city Building Inspector is no longer licensed. (He didn't keep up his <br />continuing ed credits.) A draftsman is also able to write specs and sign off <br />on plans. We could use University architect students. Carol also has a list <br />of small architectural agencies who might be interested in a building of this <br />scope. <br />Carol K talked to the New Brighton (NB) Parks and Rec. director <br />Morey Anderson, who offered us the plans for a warming shelter that they <br />have in a park. Carol said it is really nice. NB hired a small firm to draft the <br />specs and oversee construction for 52,100. We agreed that we need to <br />keep to costs down and not get an overdesigned building. The building in <br />NB is 24 by 30 ft, has water and restrooms and was built in 1988 for <br />540,000. It sounds great. We still would want an overhang but one could <br />be designed on to these plans, maybe by the same firm that designed them <br />in the first place. <br />We discussed that it was Scott's job to oversee the park project, and <br />observation time was in his contract. What about construction observation. <br />All agreed that if Scott did the site work and prepping for the building he <br />could keep track of equipment movement and digging and the order of <br />these. NB did the construction observation themselves. Roseville offered to <br />do this for us for 51,000. <br />Carol K felt we could skip the schematic phase and go write into <br />design development and spec writing. There are clearly many lower cost <br />. options. Why reinvent the wheel and waste money. Carol H asked if we <br />could used money saved in other areas of the park and Carol K indicated <br />that we could. <br />It was also generally felt that if it was easy to match the brick and <br />cedar siding at the community park building we should, but they are so far <br />apart if it became a problem, it wasn't that important. We do need an <br />overhang for picnics, however. <br />Do we want bathrooms? Yes! If it economically possible, we all <br />agreed bathrooms and a water fountain would be great. Carol K will look <br />into the sewer problem. We could put in a pump station for 51,500, but <br />they are supposedly high maintenance. Having better facilities would make <br />it nicer in the summer for more activities in the building. We will write the <br />RFP's to quote prices with and without bathrooms. <br />We will all meet at the NB park building off 35 W, North on Old <br />Highway 8 near St. John's church Wed at 5 p.m to look at the building. It <br />has windows, but they are covered with screening to protect them. We <br />also need to check the code for numbers of occupants in a given space. <br />We also would like a pay phone at the park for safety reasons. Dave said <br />he would look into the costs for it. Carol K said they will bring in the line <br />for free. <br />Carol K showed us a lovely plan for playground equipment done by <br />Landscape Structures. Carol K will look into asked for proposals that would <br />• design a play structure for 520,000 and we would select the design and <br />materials we liked best. Wood is a problem, considering the wetness of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.