PCMin_82Apr12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i~2INUTES PLAR;NING COTJ~:TISSION .APRIL 12, 1982 PAGE 5 R-1 zoning. Mr. Stefanson points out that the Task Force v~ras requested AL STEFANSON~ to develop criteria and when they are approved by the Planning Commission BOUR~UIN~ they would be passed along to American Shelter as guidelines for developing l~~'ALLIN~LARSON the Ha~akiris,-Hermes parcel of property. Bourquin and Wallin felt that LABALESTRA American Shelter wanted to get started with development along the northern strip this construction season and then come in later and request a PUD for development of the rest of the property. Council Liaison Larson was of the opinion that the PUD was a dead issue unless the court so decides, which will take a year or more. Wallin stated that he felt that American Shelter could come back with a slightly different proposal for a PUD and if it were approved, the law suit vrould be dismissed. John Labalestra felt that the developer wanted to develop the northern tier of the property for cash flow, which is consistent with what the Planning Commission and the Task Force has recommended, and now specific guide- lines should be developed generated by the Task Force, modified if necessary by the Planning Commission and passed on to the Council so that the developer could present another PIID and could be approved and developed. He does not feel that PUD is a dead issue. Harold Nilsen moved that the City Council allow Carl Dale the opzzortunity :4~OTION TO to enlarge upon the guidelines presented by the Tatum~Falcon Woods Task ALLO~~' CARL Force. Wallin seconds the motion. A discussion ensued with Labalestra DALE stating that the guidelines exceed his expectations as to what could be OPPORTUNITY developed and as far as specifics, he does not like to be locked into TO Vv~ORK ON the !~0 percent increase because of the design flexability. The PUD allows GtTIDELII~`ES for the conditional approval as you move from one step in the development to another and these are the safeguards. Stefanson and Olson are in favor of the motion. V'r"a11in states that he personally does not like to have hard and fast limits established because he believes that upper limits on density is inappropriate and density should be limited by the other prevailing factors that bear on the total situation and that is the specific use of the land. Motion carried unanimously. Stefanson again requests Harold Nilsen to research the 5,000 population STFFANSON~ question. NILSEN Nilsen moved, seconded by Olson, that the meeting be adjourned at 9:50 ADJOURN~~NT P.P-t. Next meeting scheduled for May 3, 1982. ~~~~~ J y W 1 in, Secretary •