PCMin_84Sep4 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 2 • variances: (1) Chairman 5tefanson moved approval of a six inch setback along the east and west end of the building with the condition that snow removal be the responsibility of the developer. Member Olson seconded the motion and upon a vote being taken was approved unanimously. (2) Member 1Va11in moved, seconded spaces be designated to be eight feet Mn~widthland 18 feetpinking length with the condition that the loading and unloads limited to the intensity of Paragraph 9 on Pa e ~ use be of the Developer dated September 4 g 5 of the Report 1984. Motion carried unanimously. (3) Member Olson moved, seconded by Member Wallin, that a variance be granted along the street right-of-way of Crawford and Larpenteur with the condition that screening be provided on Crawford and on L ent as permitted by the County. Motion carried unanimously. ~ eur (!t) Member Mead moved to allow parksng to be within eight feet of the budding on the west side, five feet of the builds portion of the south side (notice thatthere is only onetcustomer~e entrance to the :9u11seye store space), and within seven feet of the building on the east side otherwise open onto the sidewalk' again, there are no doors that would P ng as provided far in`-'the landscape plan of the)revised~preliminary sites lan be provided for. Motion was seconded by Member Trent-Sullivan. Upon a vote being taken, the motion carried unanimously. Member Wallin moved submstting an adviso indicating that that part of the Zoning dinance its Sectionty Council Subdivision 2(w) pertasning to wholesale distribution, wholesale0sales office and showrooms is somewhat unclear to the Planning Commission in sts sntention ae to whether or not st restricts the developers use of the premises as it has been described that the Planning Commission with .that in mind is satssfied that appropriate restrictions are already in place so that if such a conditional use is required that the planning Commission would be in favor of it. Harold Nilsen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A ten minute recess was taken. Meanber Gi'ittner expressed his concernregarding the construction of the Bullseye Plaza building in phases and after considerable discussion, Member Wallin moved an advisory opinion to the City Council that. it is the intent of the Planning Commission that the variances granted to Bullseye, Inc. are personaY to the developer and this specific planned development and it is not the sntent of the Planning Commission for the variances to run with the land or to any subsequent purchaser of the land; and it is also the intent of the variances the Planning Commission that granted ara conditioned upon the completion of the entire pro3ect even though it may be built in two stages due to the difficulty with the F,l,ameburger and its lease, The planning Commission recommends tO the City Council that their approval of the pro3ect have appropriate conditions so that Phase :II of the development be undertaken within a reasonable. time for .completion after the expiration of the Flameburger lease. The motion was seconded by Member Olson and upon a vote being VARIANCES FOR BULLSEYE GOLF, INC. APPROVED ADVISORY OPINION ~ CITY COUNCIL xEGARDING APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE Fox BULL- SEYE GOLF, INC , ADVISORY OPINION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING APPROVAL OF VARIANCES AND CONSTRUCTION IN PHASES