My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PCMin_89Jan23
FalconHeights
>
Committees and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
198x
>
1989
>
PCMin_89Jan23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2009 8:59:10 AM
Creation date
7/17/2009 8:59:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />JANUARY 23, 1989 <br />PAGE 3 <br />• not his customers. There is not enough parking in the shopping <br />center; therefore, he is concerned about his business. <br />John Uban, Planner, reviewed the history of the parking issue JOHN <br />and advised that it was determined that instead of a 5.5 per UBAN <br />thousand square feet being used for retail businesses, 4 per <br />thousand was used with the possibility of only one restaurant <br />in the shopping center, which should be located on the east end. <br />By granting the conditional. use request for the addition of the <br />golf-o-mat machines only increased the parking burden. He then <br />reviewed the parking variance request, advised that the proposed <br />deli/sportsman bar space is not being used efficiently, Embers <br />would not allow the shared parking arrangement to continue if <br />the proposal were allowed. and the fact that the deli take-out/sportsman's <br />bar does not fit into a center of this type. It was his recommendation <br />that the parking variance be denied for the following reasons: <br />(1) another parking generator cannot be added to the Bullseye <br />Plaza shopping center as there is not adequate space, (2) there <br />will be no continuation of the shared parking arrangement presently <br />in place, (3) additional uses were granted in the shopping center <br />without adjusting the parking complement, and (4) a significant <br />parking variance already exists. <br />After further discussion, Daykin moved, seconded by Barry, to PARKING <br />• deny the parking variance request for the. following reasons: VARIANCE <br />(1) there is not adequate parking on the site, (2) the shared REQUEST <br />parking arrangement with the Embers Restaurant will no longer DENIED <br />be valid if the proposal were approved, (3) additional uses were <br />granted in the shopping center without adjustment of the parking <br />complement (golf-o-mat machines), and (4) a significant parking <br />variance was previously granted. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Carroll moved, seconded by Boche, approval of the Procedures PROCEDURES <br />Manual which can be updated and changed at Planning Commission MANUAL <br />discretion when needs arise. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVED <br />Carroll moved, seconded by Duncan, that recommendations as presented <br />by the Planning Commission to the City Council to the subdivision SUBD. <br />portion of the ordinance be adopted. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVED <br />Finegan moved, seconded by Critter, adjournment at 10:20 P.M. <br />Submitted by: <br />r ' <br />r <br />Katherine J. i erman <br />Approved : ~-~ir (o, /`~ ~ q <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />Edgar F' egan, Secr ary <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.