PCMin_89Oct2 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 2, 1989 • PAGE 3 9) The B&B shall meet all State, County and City regulations, licensing and Code requirements including, but not limited to the Fire Code, the Zoning Code and the Building Code. 10) The B&B operation shall be reviewed six months after it opens and annually upon renewal. of its municipal business license. 11) The Conditional Use Permit shall expire upon change of ownership. Upon a vote being taken, the following voted in favor thereof: Duncan, Daykin, Boche, Black, Grittner, Nestingen, Finegan, Carroll and Barry. Motion carried unanimously. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USE, JOSEPH VAVROSKY, 1633 MAPLE KNOLL DRIVE Mr. Joseph Vavrosky, 1633 Maple Kno11 Drive, requested a Permitted Accessory Use to construct a utility storage shed on his property. Mr. Vavrosky described his lot, reviewed the type of storage shed to be placed on the property and the location of such shed. Mr. Ian Bain, 1626 Garden Avenue, indicated that the storage shed was very visible from his home as it was located just 48 feet from his picture window. The lot sizes in this area are narrow and • not deep. Mr. Bain suggested that property owners in this location should exhibit sensitivity to neighbors and such storage sheds should be placed in discreet locations. He was not consulted in connection with the location of the Vavrosky storage shed. He requested Planning Commission to take into consideration the size of the lots and the. size of such storage sheds so they be harmonious and in keeping with the neighborhood. After a discussion on placement, screening, and the fact that City Code encourages storage shed placement in the rear 20 percent of the lot, Boche moved, seconded by Nestingen, approval of the request for a Permitted Accessory Use. Planning Commissioners encouraged the neighbors to work together to provide screening. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USE, MICHAEL WOLFSON, 1375 WEST IDAHO Dr. Michael. Wolfson, 1375 West Idaho, requested a Permitted Accessory Use to construct a utility storage shed on his property. Dr. Wolfson was not present. After a discussion on the type of construction, placement, how it would be secured and the fact that Dr. Wolfson was not present to answer questions, Finegan moved, seconded by Boche, approval of the Permitted Accessory Use request, with the stipulation that the Building Inspector be requested to review the plans and inspect the shed after construction. Upon a vote being taken, the following voted in favor thereof: Duncan, Daykin, . Boche, Black, Nestingen, Finegan, and Carroll, and the