My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda_94Aug24
FalconHeights
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda Packets
>
199x
>
1994
>
CCAgenda_94Aug24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2010 1:22:56 PM
Creation date
11/12/2010 1:22:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O IC iii P. IN C::. i,,0 <br /> Meeting Date: 8/24/94 <br /> Agenda Item: P 1 <br /> CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS <br /> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION <br /> ITEM DESCRIPTION: Update on neighborhood traffic control <br /> SUBMITTED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Administrator <br /> REVIEWED BY: Terry Maurer, City Engineer <br /> EXPLANATION /SUMMARY: prepared by Susan Hoyt <br /> Action to date: <br /> In response to some traffic readings which indicated that at least one vehicle was <br /> driving at excessive speeds in the Falcon Woods neighborhood, the city requested <br /> residents of the neighborhood to watch for speeders and notify the city staff or the <br /> police department of the license numbers. This request was made with bright colored <br /> fliers hand delivered to every home. The city and the police department received no <br /> calls reporting speeders. <br /> The police department also assigned an unmarked car to the area for a week in mid <br /> July to check for speeders. No speeders were found, but a few persons were warned <br /> about "rolling" stops. <br /> Research on neighborhood traffic control: <br /> In addition to this, a resident of the Falcon Woods neighborhood verbally requested <br /> that the city consider "slow for children" or "watch for children" signs as an additional <br /> way to remind drivers to go slowly. Staff explained that "watch for children" signs <br /> have not found to be effective, but said the council could discuss this. Staff has also <br /> received concerns about speeding drivers in the Maple Knoll area. <br /> Staff research on the use of "watch for children" signs confirmed what the staff had <br /> been told elsewhere. Most cities are moving away from using these signs because <br /> they are not effective. In a recent publication put out by the North Central Section <br /> Institute of Transportation Engineers, there i page discussing the fact that these signs <br /> do not protect the public safety and can provide a false sense of security. <br /> Some other cities' policies on "watch for children" signs: <br /> Minneapolis. Eliminated their use and removed them 15 years ago. The <br /> city determined that the signs were not only ineffective but <br /> might inadvertently portray the message the unsigned <br /> neighborhood streets did not require watching for children. <br /> Permits residents to put up "children 10mph" signs in <br /> alleys at the residents' expense. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.