Laserfiche WebLink
Meeting Date: 10/26/94 <br /> Agenda Item: P 3 <br /> CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS <br /> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION <br /> ITEM DESCRIPTION: Consideration of a policy on sidewalk repairs <br /> SUBMITTED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Administrator <br /> REVIEWED BY: Pete Klingenberg, Public Works and Parks Superintendent <br /> Terry Maurer, City Engineer <br /> EXPLANATION /SUMMARY: <br /> (prepared by Susan Hoyt) <br /> I. BACKGROUND <br /> Purpose Sidewalks are public facilities located in the city's right -of -way. The <br /> sidewalks must be maintained to prevent injury to sidewalk users. The <br /> responsibility for maintaining sidewalks for snow removal falls to the property <br /> owner adjacent to the sidewalk. This report addresses the responsibility for <br /> repairing the public sidewalk. <br /> Approach. Over the past decade the city has taken the approach of requiring <br /> property owners adjacent to public sidewalks to undertake the repair of the <br /> sidewalk when it is determined to be a hazard to public safety. This approach <br /> applies to the two neighborhoods that have sidewalks the Northome <br /> neighborhood and the Grove neighborhood. <br /> In practice. The staff historically implemented this sidewalk repair approach by: <br /> 1. Yellow lining sidewalk slabs that were either a 1" or more rise from the <br /> base sidewalk or were severely cracked and chipped, thereby, creating <br /> a hazard to public safety. <br /> 2. Sending a letter to the property owner adjacent to the deteroriated <br /> sidewalk stating the requirement that the property owner repair the slabs <br /> within thirty days. <br /> 3. When property owners, who received the letter, called to see what <br /> options for repair were available, the staff responded that the property <br /> owner was required to eliminate the danger to the pedestrian. This <br /> would require eliminating the height differential either by replacing the <br /> old slab with a new one or by patching. No standards for concrete slab <br /> replacement were required. <br /> 4. The staff never proceeded with more letters to those property owners <br /> that did not respond to the first letter. <br />