My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-05 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
01-13-05 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2008 12:55:06 PM
Creation date
6/5/2008 12:52:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tirltit~~r~s <br />crr~ cor:vclr <br />~AVti_~rz5~ z~, coos <br />(n egrli tabiC: SITU atlOn fOr Lilo St' bll$ineS525 that arF. tEna!Ii5 Of strip Celt l'.CS. <br />LaValte felt that star went beyond the direction of the Council. <br />Fahey indicated his recollection that the Council did not limit the scope of <br />the analysis that the staff was to do. While he does not agreed with the <br />recommendations made by staff, Fahey indicated that staff did meee his <br />expectations. Fahey felt that the City has become overly restrictive with <br />regard to temporary signs. He pointed out, as an example, the <br />recommendation to require anon-profit organization to submit written <br />approval firom the owner of the property on which a temporary sign is to <br />be placed. Fahey indicated that verbal agreement by the property owner <br />was sut~icient as far as he was concerned. <br />Fahey also felt that the current ordinance was unfair in that a single <br />property owner is allowed three temporary signs per year under the <br />ordinance, while a strip mall is also allowed three temporary signs per <br />year that must be shared among all the tenants in the building. Fahey felt <br />that the same number of temporary signs should be allowed for each <br />business regardless of location, <br />The City Administrator pointed out the code enforcement issues Che City <br />is faced with relative to temporary signs. He fhrther noted that staff is <br />recommending a procedure to allow ofl=premises temporary signs for <br />community-based organizations. Currently these signs are not allowed at <br />all. <br />Patrick Nicholson, .A & yV, reported on the importance of temporary signs <br />to businesses. I3e also noted that many businesses provide community <br />support in a variety of ways, and these businesses are now looking for <br />support from the Council. <br />Zid Hanson, Rocco's Pizza, reported that businesses are looking for a <br />broadening of die City's temporary sign ordinance. <br />Dave Cossack, Crordies', indicated that he has been using temporary si~7ns <br />for many years, aid they are an impa7ant way tc advertising the forming <br />of various sports lea~~ues, as an example, which in turn help his business. <br />Cossack reported that limiting the display of a temporary siun to 10 days <br />duration would do his business no ~__>ood. <br />Fahey agreed with the need io broaden the temporary sixn ordinance to <br />help ~6e Ciry~s businesses. but pointed out that the clip side is that <br />numerous poi table signs desrnde tho appearance oi'rhe Ciry. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.