Laserfiche WebLink
ivrT~L~rEs <br />cTTx co~r~cn, <br />J;1rII.~RY 22. 2003 <br />Ricl:.Boss. representing both LCRA and 'Tiernev's. indicated that <br />temporary suns are very important to the LCRA in promoting their fund- <br />raising activities. He noted that the money raised is prat back into the <br />community. from Tieruey's perspective, banners are an important part of <br />their advertising and they have been using monthly banners for many <br />years. <br />Vicho(son pointed out that businesses spend a lot of money on their <br />signage, and he felt temporary signa<~e should be allowed as loner as it is <br />done in a tasteful way. Fahey pointed out that the City cannot dictate <br />taste, but can regulate number of signs and size. Fahey noted that some <br />businesses put up temporary signs and Lhey never come down. <br />Fahey stated that he was not in favor of any part of stags proposal that is <br />more restrictive than the current ordinance. IIe also felt that business <br />should be allowed the same number of temporary signs regardless of <br />whether they are located in a strip mall or not. Blesener indicated that he <br />did not feel limiting the display of temporary signs to ten days was a long <br />enough duration. <br />Montour asked what is considered to be a temporary sign. The City <br />Administrator reviewed the listing of temporary signs included in the <br />ordinance, He further noted that over 33% of window coverage with signs <br />is considered to be temporary signage. The City has not enforced this <br />provision of the ordinance. <br />LaValle felt that banners should be dealt with separately from the rest of <br />the Cemporary signs. LaValte also expressed concern with allowing <br />businesses in strip malls the same number of temporary, portable suns as <br />sin~~le-occupant properties. LaValle envisioned a strip mall having <br />numerous portable temporary suns on display at one time. <br />Fahey felt that the portable temporary sums were more offensive than <br />banners. Blesener a<rreed. IIe also pointed out that businesses are <br />spending a lot of money for the a eation of a banner, therefore, will want <br />to dis,~~~, it for merA tl:a:; ten da}'s. <br />f,..., .. <br />Anderson su~rsested that the ordinance distinguish portable temporary <br />liens from banners in some way. The City Administrator pointed out that <br />there are also balloons, pennants, atc. ~~uhicii must be addressed. <br />TLe City :administrator reviewed piotures of temporary signage at several <br />businesses in the Cin+. <br />