Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />FEBRUARY 10, 2005 <br />no problems in 6 fo 12 months, the how's of operation could be expanded <br />to 4 a.tn. <br />Rheaume noted that the billiard hall has a steady base of customers that <br />are used to the present operation. He felt it unfair to Mr. Alriffi to change <br />the business at this point. Rheaume suggested a six month review of the <br />CI7P. Rheaume noted that there is no alcohol on the premises to be <br />concerned about. Weihe agreed. <br />Rheaume felt Ah'iffi should be given a chance to show he can run the <br />billiard hall in an acceptable manner. Rheaume noted that there can be <br />more problems at a Perkins after the 2 a.m. bar closing time than at a <br />billiard hall. <br />Melloy agreed with Rheaume's comments, and pointed out that this is an <br />existing business that has been t'uwiing well and growing for the past five <br />years. <br />Knudsen asked the average age of Alriff's staff. /~Iriffi estimated ages at <br />from 20 to ;0 years in age. <br />Knudsen agreed that the City should not constrain the business at this <br />point and should give Alriffi the oppotrtunity to run the business as <br />successfully at Mr. Melloy has done. Knudsen felt a review period should <br />be established for the CUP, and if there are issues that arise, they would be <br />dealt with at that time. <br />Duray stated that he was looking to prevent problems by suggesting the <br />closing time be set at 2 a.tn. Duray felt that closing tithe eliminated a <br />potential problem. <br />Knudsen recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow a <br />billiard/amusement hall as a commercial recreation use in the PUD <br />Uisfrict at 2900 Rice Street as requested by Ahmed Alriffi subject to there <br />being no alcohol on the premises, and allowing a a a.m. closing time, but <br />posted hours to remain shown as a 2 a.m. closing time as is the current <br />practice by Mr. Melloy. <br />Motion seconded by Rheaume. <br />,Motion carried 6 - 1. Wojcik voted against. <br />