My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-05-2004 Parks Commission Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
02-05-2004 Parks Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2008 9:23:29 AM
Creation date
7/15/2008 9:12:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />Parks & Recreation Commission <br />February 5, 2004 <br />Sanders presented revised signage plans to the Commission for their review. He stated that <br />Canadian Days has expressed some concern about the prior placement of the stone column on <br />the west side of the park entrance due to the ability to maneuver around it. Therefore, the sign <br />has been moved to accommodate their concern. The sign will be placed in the center island of <br />the parking lot entrance where the flagpole is currently located. The flagpole will be relocated <br />to the back of the sign. Concrete pavers featuring the City logo will be added with the <br />possibility of placing flowers in the center. This wooden sign will be placed between two stone <br />columns. <br />Sanders presented four different scenarios of how the park name could be presented along with <br />wording recognizing Canadian Days. The majority of the Commission favored "Concept E" <br />where the sign would be widened from 6" to T6" between the columns to accommodate the <br />length of the name, the park name is listed as "Carl Spooner Park," and a seperate board could <br />be added below the main sign to incorporate the wording "Site of Canadian Days Celebration." <br />Deb Sinna, vice-president of Canadian Days, indicated that the Canadian Days Committee feels <br />that Canadian Days wording on the sign would be nice because it would create more visibility <br />and recognition for the festival. She stated that the celebration has been held in Spooner Park <br />for 25 years and the Canadian Days Committee does not foresee changing the location. <br />Gray commented that he was not in favor of Canadian Days recognition on the sign. He stated <br />that although Canadian Days has made a big contribution to the city, he felt that it would set a <br />precedent for other organizations wanting to be recognized on park signs. Larson was in favor <br />of the Canadian Days message on the sign because it gives a "small town" feel to the <br />community. Crary was okay with adding the Canadian Days message, but felt that less wording <br />is better such as "Site of Canadian Days." Sackett Glaser agreed that less wording is better, but <br />she was in favor of recognizing Canadian Days due to their contributions. <br />Broten expressed concern about the wood portion of the sign and its ability to be replaced in <br />future years when it deteriorates. Sanders said that brackets could be installed to hold the wood <br />portion to make its replacement easier. <br />Larson recommended that "Concept E" be chosen for the park sign at Spooner Park witle the <br />wording to remain as shown on the plan. <br />Motion seconded by Steinert. <br />Motion carried 6-1 (Cray voted against). <br />Larson preferred that the whole logo be constructed with pavers. He felt that the logo would be <br />lost in the flowers. The flowers could be planted elsewhere. <br />Sanders commented that the flagpole will be lit and the electrical boxes could be hidden behind <br />the columns. <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.