Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 12, 2015 <br />house. Keis noted that the City will have to purchase new election <br />machines and asked if the City would avoid this cost if it contracts with <br />the County. The Administrator indicated that if the City contracts with the <br />County to run its elections, the City will still have to pay these costs. <br />There was some discuss on the pros and cons of contracting with the <br />County versus retaining elections in-house. <br />With regard to minute taking, the Administrator estimated that contracting <br />with a service would cost between $4,000 and $5,000 per year and perhaps <br />higher given the number of workshops that are held each year. The <br />Administrator stated that it was his preference to keep this work in-house, <br />but perhaps finding someone to do the Park Commission minutes. <br />The Administrator noted that eliminating the election and minutes duties <br />from the City Clerk position reduces the position to part-time. There was <br />general discussion of the other job duties of the City Clerk position. <br />Montour indicated that based on his discussions with the City Clerk he <br />estimated that the cost of contracting for minute preparation may be <br />$5,000 to $6,000 per year. Montour suggested that there may be other <br />work focusing on direct citizen contact that this position could then <br />undertake. The Administrator noted that if the position became an <br />Assistant Administrator position, there may be typical City Clerk duties <br />that would not be the right fit. He expressed concern for longevity in an <br />Assistant Administrator position and the ability to build institutional <br />knowledge. The Administrator felt the chances of longevity in an <br />Assistant position versus Clerk position were better with a City Clerk <br />because the desire for career advancement possibilities may not be the <br />same. The Administrator also felt that having the City Clerk at the <br />meetings was a help to him with regard times when it is necessary to <br />clarify Council direction. <br />McGraw noted the Administrator's comment in his report that minutes <br />will likely not be as detailed going forward. The Administrator felt that <br />that would not be an issue given that meetings are now available through <br />web streaming, etc. McGraw indicated that the past minutes have been an <br />asset to him in understanding previous Council actions. McGraw stated <br />that he felt having a long-term employee that has developed institutional <br />knowledge was an asset for the City. <br />Keis indicated that when this opportunity presented itself, his goals were <br />to find someone to back up the City Administrator and take his place when <br />he is out of the office. Keis stated that he would also like to reduce the <br />work load on the City Administrator so that he can concentrate on the high <br />value work. The Administrator indicated that in some cities the City Clerk <br />functions in the Administrator role, although that is not typical in the <br />Metro. The Administrator felt that it will come down to the person's skill <br />2 <br />