My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-02-2004 Parks Commission Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
09-02-2004 Parks Commission Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2008 9:54:03 AM
Creation date
7/15/2008 9:49:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br />~i <br />o~ ~z'z`~ C°anaa~a <br />515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117-1600 <br />(651) 766-4029 /FAX: (651) 766-4045 <br />www.ci.little-canada. mn.us <br />NIIJMORANDUM <br />TO: Members of the Parks c`;; Recreation Commission <br />FROM: ,Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br />DATL: August 27, 2004 <br />RE: Gelvais Hills Parlc Charge <br />MAYOR <br />Michael I. L'ahey <br />COUNCIL <br />Jim LaValle <br />Matt Anderson <br />Rick Montour <br />Bill Blesener <br />ADMINISTRATOR <br />Joel R. Hanson <br />At your Niay 6°i meetin<r the Commission voted to recommend that cash be accepted in lieu of land <br />for the park charge on the proposed Gervais Hills residential development. In staff's further review <br />of this issue, it became apparent that this development presented an opportunity to address drainage <br />problems on County Road B-2. One option to do this would be to take a land dedication in lieu of the <br />cash park charge in order to accommodate additional storm water ponding/passive recreational <br />development. <br />In a July 21" letter to the developer (copy attached), staff noted its concerns with the proposed <br />development and outlined the possibility of a land dedication in lieu of cash park charge. The <br />developer is not in favor of this option due to the potential loss of one buildable lot. He is also <br />questionin<r our legal aLrthority to use a land dedication in this way. To resolve this issue, he has <br />proposed additional ponding within his project without the loss of a lot. The City Engineer is <br />evaluating this revised submittal and will be commenting on the adequacy of this additional ponding <br />for the development and the County Road B-3 drainage problems. <br />Staff would like the Parks and Recreation Commission to comment on the use of land dedication <br />versus cash park charge to accommodate the County Road B-2 drainage problem and to provide some <br />passive open space area in the event that the developer's most recent submittal does not adequately <br />address the drainage problems. <br />cc: john Whitcomb <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.