My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-2004 Planning Comm. Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
02-12-2004 Planning Comm. Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2008 10:32:40 AM
Creation date
7/15/2008 1:35:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />FEBRUARY 12, 2004 <br />Keis indicated that the problem is the request for ten times the outdoor <br />storage that has been approved for this site. Groholski indicated that some <br />of the equipment will be removed, but the type of storage that is there will <br />remain. Groholski indicated that he is planning to construct another <br />building in two to three years as a way to enclose some of the storage. <br />Keis again pointed out that the proposal is for ten times the storage that <br />was originally approved. Cn'oholski stated that what is stored on the site is <br />needed for his business. He pointed out that he saves and recycles logs so <br />that he does not have to pay dumping fees. <br />Barraclough asked if the long-term plan is to construct another building if <br />a temporary outdoor storage use could be allowed. The City Planner <br />indicated that occasionally the City has granted owners a short period of <br />time to resolve an enforcement problem. That is usually a period of three <br />to six months. However, if the suggestion is a period of years, then the <br />ordinance should be amended to allow for an interim use permit and the <br />property owner be required to enter into a development contract. <br />Keis pointed out that the City has been fairly strict in Ryan Industrial Park <br />with regard to outdoor storage. Keis felt that the Commission needed a <br />more specific site plan and better estimate on the maximum amount of <br />outdoor storage that is needed. This plan should also indicate which areas <br />are paved and which are not. <br />The Planner indicated that the area behind the building is paved. The <br />Code required that all outdoor storage be screened and paved. <br />I{eis stated that he would prefer to table action on this matter until a more <br />exact site plan can be developed. He noted that the problem is that the <br />Precision Tree site is out of compliance and the request before the City <br />was too much. I{eis also felt that there was no hardship to warrant <br />granting the variance. I{eis noted that the other issue is that of the wood <br />burning heat source. <br />John Anich, 110 Yorkton Ridge, indicated that the fire in the wood <br />burning heat source is different from a typical wood-burning stove. It is <br />more of a smoldering fire that churns out acreosote-burning smell. Anich <br />indicated that the smell is a problem. Anich also expressed concern with <br />the loss of trees on the Precision Tree site and suggested that the trees <br />were taken down to provide room for outdoor storage. <br />I{eis asked about the fuel tanks. The City Planner indicated that the Fire <br />Marshal approved a permit for the fuel tanks, but these where not shown <br />on the original site plan. <br />-6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.