Laserfiche WebLink
to force one of the two tenant families to move in order to bring it to conformity? <br />What if It Is one unit of a quadpiex is vacant for a year, or one unit of 50 unit <br />apartment? The consequences of applying this standard to multi -tenant buildings <br />as a whole would be unfair and overly burdensome, <br />O Recent examples of the City of Little Canada concluding that a duplex property lost it's <br />status as a nonconforming use differ from my case, In the May of 2014 29 Demont Ave <br />example the City disallowed the new owners of the property to use the structure as a <br />duplex, nor did they approve a request to rezone the property as R-2. My case differs <br />from these circumstances because my structure was never unoccupied for any length <br />greater than one year, whereas the Demont Ave property was completely vacant for a <br />period greater than one year. <br />• There Is too Targe a burden in retrofitting the building as a single family residence that <br />meats city ordinance and neighborhood standards, <br />o The building is essentially two fully independent units with separate water, <br />electrical, gas, and hvac systems, In would be extremely costly to combine those <br />saperate infrastructures into one safe and properly functioning system. <br />o The current fioorplan offers redundant spaces that would be unnecessary in a <br />single family home. It would be undesirable to have two small kitchens, <br />conversion to a single family emit would require the removat of one kitchen and. <br />the expansion of another, <br />o The property is divided down the center by a shared load bearing wall with extra <br />thickness, Insulation and plating for sound deadening which would be nearly <br />Impossible to remove, Easier modifications such as pass through doorways <br />would also be costly and would still result in a floorplan that doesn't make sense <br />for a single family home. <br />o The property has two garages on opposite ends of the building. If the property Is <br />to conform to code and to other properties in the area, one of the garages would <br />need to be converted to livable space. This would require extraordinary <br />modifications to the interior walls and doors of the garage, extension of electrical <br />and hvac systems, the extension of an exterior wall to replace the garage door, <br />Insulation, and the installation of floor joists and subfloor over the concrete slab, <br />and the likely installation of additional windows, <br />U Removal of one garage would also require the costly modification and removal of <br />Targe portions of the existing concrete driveway leading up to it. <br />O The financial burden associated with making these changes will be costly, and <br />likely exceed the value of the structure as it sits now. Moreovar the properties <br />value as. a single family home is significantly reduced compared to it's value as a <br />residential duplex/double bungalow, <br />• As someone with a disability and limited income earning potential, the duplex represents <br />my own financial security and a supporting Income stream for retirement. Selling this <br />10 <br />