My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-2015 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
10-28-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2015 3:09:12 PM
Creation date
10/23/2015 2:54:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 13 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS <br />base), the increased rates do not yield more increment. Furthermore, in the twin cities metropolitan area <br />and in the taconite tax relief area, increment may be reduced by the fiscal disparities contribution for the <br />district's properties, if the city elects that option. <br />Note that the excess taxes in this discussion, which may be referred to as "excess TIF" or "base <br />excess," are different from "excess increments" (or "surplus TIF") which are discussed later in this <br />Section .13.01. <br />Increments May Be Attributable to Other Factors as well as New <br />Construction <br />Increments may be attributed to: <br />• Construction of improvements <br />• Overall inflation in property values unrelated to development <br />• Market effects that are attributable to the TIF development, if the properties are in the TIF <br />district. (proximity to a new development, in many cases, will increase the value of surrounding <br />properties.) <br />• Market effects that are unrelated to the TIF development, if the properties are in the TIF districts. <br />(market values in areas around TIF districts may increase and these increases may be caused by <br />factors, such as shifts in locational values or tastes, other than the TIF development. For <br />example, some researchers have observed the tendency of cities to put TIF districts in areas that <br />are already experiencing rising property values.) <br />Other Limitations to Using TIF as a Financing Method <br />Development costs must be paid "up -front" or at the very beginning of the development, but the <br />increased property taxes (increments) are not paid until later and, then, only in modest amounts (relative <br />to the development costs) spread over many years. This creates an imbalance or mismatch between costs <br />and revenues, TIF traditionally overcomes this mismatch by issuing bonds. These bonds pay for: <br />1, Development cost (e.g., site acquisition); <br />2. Interest on the bonds until increments are received. The need to pay these interest costs on <br />borrowing, pending receipt of increments is commonly referred to as capitalizing interest. The <br />need to capitalize interest means that increment flows must be larger to pay off this component <br />of the cost. <br />Before 1986, bonds were routinely used as part of TIF financing. These bonds were usually tax exempt, <br />providing a lower interest rate to the city and the developers. The 1986 tax reform made it more difficult <br />to issue tax-exempt bonds for this purpose. This took away much of the incentive for the local <br />TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 13.01 .20 <br />REVISION DATE: NOVEMBER, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.