My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-2004 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
02-25-2004 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:36:28 PM
Creation date
7/17/2008 8:54:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCII, <br />FEBRUARY 25, 2004 <br />IMPROVEMENT their watermain that is near the Twin Lake area much sooner than <br />expected. Vadnais I-Ieights has also indicated that the Collova Family has <br />expressed interest in developing their property located near the Twin Lake <br />area, which increases the likelihood that the Vadnais Heights watermain <br />will be looped. The City Administrator suggested that the Twin Lake <br />property owners be surveyed once again to determine if their preference is <br />for Little Canada water with its added cost in light of the potential for an <br />earlier loop of the Vadnais Heights watermain. <br />Fahey questioned whether it was likely that Vadnais Heights would move <br />quickly on looping its watermain, but agreed that this new information <br />should be provided to the Twin Lal<e area property owners. Fahey <br />suggested that a new survey be sent with the results presented to the full <br />Council on March IO`C'. <br />Anderson stated that he was hesita~rt to support the Little Canada <br />watermain option from a cost standpoint. He agreed that the information <br />that Vadnais heights may loop their line quicker than anticipated should <br />be preseuted to the residents. however, he was unsure how committed <br />Vadnais Heights really was to doing so. Anderson felt a new survey <br />should be sent to the 'Cwin Lake area outlining the Council's <br />recommendation of February 23"~, the additional cost of the Little Canada <br />option, and getting the property owners' reaction to that recommendation. <br />LaValle pointed out that if Vadnais Heights' watermain is extended into <br />the Twin Lake area, Little Canada would not bill those residents. <br />Anderson pointed out that if Little Canada watermain is extended and the <br />City turns over its water system to St. Paul, Little Canada would no longer <br />bill. Alderson pointed out that the capital costs of extending watermain to <br />the area would not be recovered as part of the billing for water usage. <br />Fahey noted that the issue of extending Little Canada watermain to the <br />Twin Lalce area is one of maintaining a sense of Little Canada community <br />to those property owners. Anderson pointed out that there are other Little <br />Canada property owners who are supplied water from Vadnais Heights. <br />LaValle stated that he supported another survey, and hoped that the <br />response would be better than the first. He suggested that staff contact <br />those property owners who do not respond in an effort to obtain the input <br />of all the I'wiu Lal<e area property owners. <br />ADJOURN Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RR.SOI_ UTION NO. 2004-2-36 -ADJOURNING <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.