My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-09-2015 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
11-09-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2015 4:02:20 PM
Creation date
11/23/2015 3:47:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES Attachment D <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 27, 2001 <br />O VING TME <br />The for rcs517F*w*yAjduly seconded by Fahey. <br />LaValle, Fahey, Sea ze, �ra�:: Montour. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />PITRINA PARK Mr. Carl Helgeson, President of the Pitrina Park Homeowners Association, <br />REQUEST FOR appeared before the City Council requesting that the City take over the <br />CITY TO TAKE ownership and maintenance of the five private cul-de-sacs in Pitrina Park. <br />OVER PRIVATE Helgeson pointed out that the property owners in Pitrina Park pay high <br />STREETS property taxes and are not getting the same services that other property owners <br />receive. Helgeson requested that based on the issue of fairness, the City take <br />over the maintenance of these cul -de -saes. <br />Fahey pointed out that the difficulty is that the cul-de-sacs were not <br />constructed to City standards with regard to both construction and amount of <br />right-of-way. Fahey also noted that the setbacks of the towmhomes from the <br />cul-de-sacs would not meet the City's minimum setback requirements. These <br />issues were discussed with the developer at the time Pitrina Park was proposed, <br />and the developer requested the cul-de-sacs be private. Fahey pointed out that <br />the Council discussed with the developer in no uncertain terms that these cul- <br />de-sacs would not be City streets and would remain the responsibility of the <br />developer or townhome association. Fahey stated that he did not feel it was <br />unfair not to accept the cul-de-sacs as public streets. <br />Helgeson reported that not all the Pitrina Park property owners knew the cul- <br />de-sacs were private at the time they purchased their townhome. Helgeson <br />indicated that lie did some measuring of some other streets in town and found <br />cul-de-sac areas to be smaller than those in Pitrina Park, specifically that of <br />Savage Lane. <br />Scalze pointed out that the Savage 'Lane cul-de-sac may be narrower- given that <br />the freeway went in after the street already existed. Scalze also pointed out <br />that rifght-of=way is not the same as pavement width. In the case of Pitrina <br />Park, there is inadequate right-of-way. <br />Helgeson pointed out that the City never asked the Pitrina .Park homeowners if <br />they wanted the cul-de-sacs as private. The issue was between the City and the <br />developer. Helgeson pointed out that the developer wanted private cul-de-sacs <br />in order to maximize his space, and the City wanted to maximize property <br />taxes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.