My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-09-2015 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
11-09-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2015 11:12:03 AM
Creation date
12/8/2015 11:11:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 9, 2015 <br />City Attorney Kelly confirmed that the law does not allow public money <br />to be used for private streets. The Associations declarations state that they <br />are private streets. <br />Fischer noted that he also lives in a townhome association and has the <br />same situation. He stated that the city does not tax "a la carte" and has the <br />same obligation to everyone. People pay taxes for the greater good of the <br />community. McGraw asked Johnson if the association was willing to <br />bring their streets up to city standards. He also questioned why should the <br />city maintain substandard streets when everyone else had to pay for a <br />standard street. He stated that he is not in favor of reimbursing the <br />association. <br />Jim Winberg, president of the Cobblestone Village Association, stated that <br />when he was reviewing notes from this development, it started out with 40. <br />buildings, then down to 38, but only 34 buildings were eventually built. <br />He asked if the city was sure that the streets are not up to code. There is <br />the question of how wide the cul-de-sacs are and the front setback for the <br />homes from the street. He said he's not sure if it's a given that they streets <br />aren't up to code since the development shrank which could have left <br />more space for streets. After 20 years of the development existing, the <br />association conceivably has built up a maintenance reserve from the city <br />that could be enough to bring the streets up to code. The main issue isn't <br />plowing, it's the street maintenance. <br />City Attorney again stated that the city cannot use public funds for private <br />enterprise. <br />Torkelson noted that the sign at the entrance to this neighborhood states <br />that it's a private area. Do the homeowners want everyone driving <br />FA <br />but they are paying taxes, the city should reimburse the association for <br />MAINTENANCE <br />street maintenance and snow plowing costs that are not spent in their <br />COSTS FOR <br />development that are part of property tax payments. <br />PRIVATE <br />STREET— <br />Mayor Keis noted that it is not unusual to have private streets in <br />COBBLESTONE <br />townhome developments that do not meet city standards. If the city does <br />VILLAGE — <br />this for Cobblestone Village, it would have to reimburse all the <br />JAMES JOHNSON <br />associations. He pointed out that everyone pays taxes towards the schools <br />even though they may not have kids in school. Also, everyone drives on <br />other city streets to use theirs. The City Administrator stated that this has <br />been discussed before and it's an equity question. It's difficult to break <br />down specific costs of street maintenance and plowing per property given <br />the variables at play. The City cannot legally just pay out money — it has <br />to be for a public purpose. <br />City Attorney Kelly confirmed that the law does not allow public money <br />to be used for private streets. The Associations declarations state that they <br />are private streets. <br />Fischer noted that he also lives in a townhome association and has the <br />same situation. He stated that the city does not tax "a la carte" and has the <br />same obligation to everyone. People pay taxes for the greater good of the <br />community. McGraw asked Johnson if the association was willing to <br />bring their streets up to city standards. He also questioned why should the <br />city maintain substandard streets when everyone else had to pay for a <br />standard street. He stated that he is not in favor of reimbursing the <br />association. <br />Jim Winberg, president of the Cobblestone Village Association, stated that <br />when he was reviewing notes from this development, it started out with 40. <br />buildings, then down to 38, but only 34 buildings were eventually built. <br />He asked if the city was sure that the streets are not up to code. There is <br />the question of how wide the cul-de-sacs are and the front setback for the <br />homes from the street. He said he's not sure if it's a given that they streets <br />aren't up to code since the development shrank which could have left <br />more space for streets. After 20 years of the development existing, the <br />association conceivably has built up a maintenance reserve from the city <br />that could be enough to bring the streets up to code. The main issue isn't <br />plowing, it's the street maintenance. <br />City Attorney again stated that the city cannot use public funds for private <br />enterprise. <br />Torkelson noted that the sign at the entrance to this neighborhood states <br />that it's a private area. Do the homeowners want everyone driving <br />FA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.