Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 25, 2004 <br />However, the Watershed did issue its permit the very next day. Therefore, <br />the Watershed could have still denied the permit if they truly were <br />concerned. <br />Fahey noted that the Watershed has approved the pond in its present <br />location. The City Administrator indicated that the Watershed has <br />approved the grading and drainage plan for the project. The City Engineer <br />has also reviewed that plan. <br />Walstead questioned why work on pond began two to three weeks prior to <br />Watershed approval. The City Administrator replied that that was not <br />correct. Work on the pond began only a few days prior to the Watershed <br />issuing its permit, Walstead indicated that trees were cut two to three <br />weeks prior to Watershed approval. The City Administrator indicated that <br />Watershed approval is not required prior to the cutting of trees. <br />Fahey noted that the Watershed has approved the plan and has issued its <br />permit. Fahey stated that he understands that Walstead is not happy with <br />the process. Fahey asked if there were any other concerns that Walstead <br />wished to raise. <br />Walstead indicated that at the time of his meeting with the Watershed, <br />they had approved 4 to 5 items that were part of the permit, but were <br />waiting for calculations on saturation issues. Fahey noted that those <br />calculations were received, and the Watershed then issued the permit. <br />Walstead replied that that was correct. <br />Fahey suggested if any additional issues arise, that Walstead discuss those <br />with the City Engineer and City Administrator who would respond in an <br />appropriate fashion. <br />Trude indicated that the Walstead's only want to know what is happening <br />behind their home. <br />A~DJOiJRN L,aValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RE.SO7. U%'ION NO. 2004-K-197 - AD.IOURNING <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Blesener. <br />Ayes (5)'LaValle, Blesener, Anderson, Fahey, Montour. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />There being uo further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p. m. <br />Is <br />