My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-2004 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
08-25-2004 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:38:08 PM
Creation date
7/17/2008 9:13:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 25, 2004 <br />AND NOTING THAT THERE Ib' A HARDSIHP PRESENT GIVEN <br />THE TOPOGRAPHICAL NATURE OF THE I AND,THE FACT <br />THAT TBE Ea7STING WA7_I IS ERODING AND CAUSING <br />ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS, AND GNEN THE NEED TO <br />RBPL ACE AND EXTEND THE WAL L FROM A SAFETY <br />STANDPOINT <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Fahey. <br />Ayes (5) :LaValle, Fahey, Montow', Blesener, Anderson. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />PROPERTY Fahey opened the public hearing to consider a Property Division allowing <br />DIVISION & a (ot line adjustment and a Variance to allow a building on a lot with no <br />VARIANCE - direct public sU'eet frontage at 3069 Arcade Street as requested by Oscar <br />3069 A~RCAD.E Lane. Fahey noted that the Planning Commission has recommended <br />STREET - approval. <br />OSCAR LANE <br /> Fahey noted this the situation is unique in that the flag lot behind 3069 <br /> Arcade Street is an existing lot of record. He commented, however, that <br /> he would be opposed to any future subdivision of that property. <br />Mr. Lane stated that he had no objection to Yhat position. <br />There was no one present from the general public wishing to comment on <br />this matter. <br />Upon motion by LaValle, seconded by Montour, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RFb'O7 UTION N0. 2004-8-19T - APPROVING A PROPERTY <br />DIVISION ALI OWING A LOT L INE ADJUSTMENT F'OR 3069 <br />ARCADE STREET AS WELL. AS A VAXIANCE TO ALI OW THE <br />DE r/EI OPMENT OF ASINGLE-FAMILY HOME ON A LOT WITH <br />L7TI'ED PU137.IC STREET FRONTAGE SI773.IECT TO <br />COMPL IANCE WI'T'H T HE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITY <br />PLANNER AND PU737.IC WORKS DIRECTOR, AND CONTINGENT <br />THAT THERE RE NU FURTHER SU73DI VISION OF TIZE <br />PROPERTYINUOL VED <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Blesener. <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Blesener, Montour, Fahey, Anderson. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.